Star Trek Sequel Title Uncovered (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Movie News


Empire Admin -> Star Trek Sequel Title Uncovered (10/9/2012 8:19:53 PM)

Post your comments on this article

Kmadden2004 -> So... (10/9/2012 8:19:53 PM)

Into Darkness + 3D glasses = pitch black

KingButtMonkey -> (10/9/2012 8:32:23 PM)

Don't need to worry about darkness, there will be plenty of lens flare to go around.

BurtonWildheart -> hurry up!! (10/9/2012 8:34:42 PM)

first one was about as close to Star Wars action as you can get...bring on the sequel

clarkkent -> (10/9/2012 8:45:08 PM)

Uhm, everything I've read about this title seems to suggest it isn't confirmed. Just saying it seems like an odd thing to report without actual confirmation.

rudyalapag -> darkness (10/9/2012 10:46:33 PM)

something "darkness" this way comes. wearing the 3D glasses will tip the dark while watching StarTrek Into Darkness. i'm beginning to love the title "dark" for movies like these: "THE DARK KNIGHT RISES" and "THE DARK KNIGHT" and saying what Darth Vader we always says: if you ever knew the power of the dark side, joining the dark side is really fun. Star Wars fame of course.

homersimpson_esq -> LOVE (11/9/2012 3:10:05 AM)

I like it.

Just saying.

NeoBrowser -> RE: LOVE (11/9/2012 3:46:24 AM)

If Abrams 1st Star Trek is anything to go by, this will almost certainly be better than Wrath of Kahn

herbertwest1701 -> (11/9/2012 7:39:01 AM)

Although it might be fairly considered as jumping on the "dark sequels are cool" bandwagon, I can certainly understand their avoidance of Star Trek: Something. It's actually quite unique in that it uses the 'Star Trek' phrase in an organic way... as in Trek "into" darkness. And it feels mysterious. What might work against it is that there is supposedly still much fun and comedy in the movie.

TwistedAnimator -> RE: (11/9/2012 9:58:45 AM)

More of the same please!
The first film was a very pleasant surprise

Simon124 -> (11/9/2012 1:25:17 PM)

Well, yes, using 'trek' as a verb is original in a ST movie title, but wasn't it first used in First Contact by Zephram Cochran when asking if the TNG crew were 'on some kind of star trek'?

film man aidy -> RE: (11/9/2012 2:06:59 PM)

Cool title. Hope it equates to a great movie.

dcrow1975 -> I Think Not!!! (11/9/2012 3:08:14 PM)

I love Star Trek, but you can be guaranteed that this title will change before it's released, still, not as bad a title as the third part of The Hobbit.

fantastic mr ethan -> Even in Darkness, They'll be Lens Flare (11/9/2012 10:20:59 PM)

I guarantee it

theturk -> A trek by any other name (14/9/2012 5:14:38 PM)

They can call it what they damn well like, just make it as good as the first.

Riaz Ali -> Star Trek : Attack of the Colons (14/9/2012 7:24:08 PM)

Star Trek : The Colon Wars
Star Trek and the Temple Of Doom
Star Trek and the Unbearable Lightness of Being
Star Trek Does Dallas

HighwayJoe -> At the end of the day... (14/9/2012 10:35:27 PM)

...the title is really the least of it. It's the sequel to one of the few re-makes/reboots I have actually enjoyed. Abrams could've called it 'Star Trek Yet Another One All Right Yeah' and I'd still be lining up to get my ticket.

For what it's worth, though, 'Into Darkness' isn't half bad.

Galen Muffley -> I see what he's saying... (15/9/2012 12:07:43 AM)

...but still, the title instantly brings 'Star Trekkin'' to mind. The phrasing fits. "Star Trek in-to Da-a-a-rk-ness"!...

Duff2k1 -> RE: I Think Not!!! (15/9/2012 12:19:07 AM)

There and Back Again? i'd say that was quite an apt title

Page: [1]

Valid CSS!

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI