|
Olaf -> RE: Lets play RETRO!!! (5/5/2012 8:23:12 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juanvasquez
quote:
ORIGINAL: Olaf
quote:
ORIGINAL: juanvasquez
Played some Mario 64 earlier. Father time has not been kind. To the controls anyway. But then I did put it on after playing Mario Land 3D. Although I think the level design was rather poor in both. In terms of longevity I mean.
Really?? I spent hours on it last summer. The flying sections are pretty awful but the level designs still held up for me (maybe not as well as something like SMB3, but that was a refinement of the 2D Mario rather than completely new so it's understandably more polished).
Don't get me wrong, it's still great, but you just feel like you're steering Mario rather than controlling him. If that makes any sense! The level designs are good. They just seem short compared a lot of other platformers.
I'd actually agree with that tbh - the movement controls are definitely a lot tighter on the next few games (previous few as well I suppose, even if it is just left/right/up [:D]). The levels probably are shorter, but it feels like more of them than before so I would be inclined to let that one slide.
quote:
ORIGINAL: directorscut
2D Mario >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D Mario.
I would probably agree based on the fact that two of my top three are in 2D (1. SMB3, 2. SMG, 3. SMW). I still haven't played Galaxy 2 though. [:(]
|
|
|
|
