|
zweigenbaum -> Anonymous by Emmerich (12/3/2010 6:50:00 AM)
|
Within the Oxfordian movement (scholars who have proven Edward de Vere, 17th earl of Oxford wrote the Shake-Speare canon) we still disagree about critical facts in this suppressed history of the early English state. But one thing we all agree about is that the Stratford Shakspere had nothing to do with the noble works we read and view today. He was a promoter, producer, money-lender, property-owner, but never the writer who wrote the works, de Vere, whose pseudonym Shake-Speare, meaningful to him, resembled the Stratford businessman's. It is a good sign for world culture that the false cover that has been perpetuated as the biography of 'Shakespeare' is finally crumbling. The works were written by a human being, a nobleman with a vision of what man eternally is, whose sense of honor was crushed by the times and England's self-aggrandizing leaders, his name buried under a pseudonym and an expediency that has become the familiar shoddy myth. I hope the movie captures that tragedy.
|
|
|
|
