RE: Terminator Borenation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Film Forums] >> Film Reviews



Message


Tech_Noir -> RE: Terminator Borenation (7/6/2009 7:05:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tech_Noir

I really hope there is an extended director's cut of this film because I'm sure there's a better version out there.

And I'm not just saying that because I wanna see Moon's boobies. [:D]


I don't think there was a love scene. There is a moment after Marcus and Blair meet when she is looking at her injury and Marcus goes off - I am pretty sure that is where that scene would be from as she is getting changed. The very next scene she is wearing something else - very odd cut.



Then her releasing Marcus was one of the daftest things in the movie.

Lack of character development made a lot of things in the film seem daft.

And giving Skynet lots of faces just reminded me of Star Trek 5!




Squidward Hark Bugle -> RE: Actually quite rubbish. (minor "plot" spoilers) (7/6/2009 7:33:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Funkyrae

I dunno about that.  I think he's pretty good actually.  Yeah he's taken some real clunkers but you have to give him props for The Machinist.


He didn't even turn in a good performance for The Machinist. Smart of him to make the physical transformation, so that his appearance would overshadow his lack of acting abilities.




Wilbert -> RE: Terminator Borenation (7/6/2009 7:33:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kermodenutter1

SPOLIER ALERT!!!Nothing That Special Coming From This Terminator Film. With A Unconvincing John Connor From Bale And A Animated Clone Of Ol Arnie That Looked So Fake, I Was Actually Happy When Connor Was About To Die!!!! But Someone Is Miraculosly There To Donate A Heart To Him And Open Heart Surgery Is Performed In A Desert! Come On Guys!!! The Most Unbeliveable Of The Terminator Franchise. And What Sort Of A Name Is McG???????


At least McG doesn't capitalise every word in a sentence!




Squidward Hark Bugle -> RE: Terminator Borenation (7/6/2009 7:35:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wilbert


quote:

ORIGINAL: kermodenutter1

SPOLIER ALERT!!!Nothing That Special Coming From This Terminator Film. With A Unconvincing John Connor From Bale And A Animated Clone Of Ol Arnie That Looked So Fake, I Was Actually Happy When Connor Was About To Die!!!! But Someone Is Miraculosly There To Donate A Heart To Him And Open Heart Surgery Is Performed In A Desert! Come On Guys!!! The Most Unbeliveable Of The Terminator Franchise. And What Sort Of A Name Is McG???????


At least McG doesn't capitalise every word in a sentence!


But he does have two capitals in his three-letter name.




Tech_Noir -> RE: Terminator Borenation (7/6/2009 7:37:00 PM)

McG did a decent job it was the script and the rating restrictions that was the problem, nothing more.

I almost laughed when that guy tried to climb out of the camp and got shot. They cut to him falling asleep or something.




coljohnmatrix -> RE: Devin from CHUD reviews for Empire?? (7/6/2009 7:42:43 PM)

I challenge anyone to read out Emyr Thy King's post on page 14 without hearing the voice of Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons in your head reading the post out in your mind [;)]




Emyr Thy King -> RE: Four stars? For this? (7/6/2009 8:14:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dh_19
I think the T-1000's need for basic human responses covers most of these.


We know this to be the case. The question is why does it choose to exhibit such emotion when it performs no function and yields no use to the T-1000's mission?

The T-1000 kills the dog Max after it realised that it had been fooled by the T-800 impersonating John Connor.

The T-1000 kills the lorry driver of the liquid nitrogen container after the helicopter he was flying was smashed to pieces.

quote:

As for the expressions it gives when it's being destroyed, well, it was being destroyed and was broken.


Whereupon this occurence it visibly reacted to what was happening to it. It's patently obvious to see.

quote:

When it's dying at the end of T2 and begins morphing into previous forms, i don't think it's doing it intentionally to provide them with one last head fuck, it simply isn't functioning correctly.


I never suggested that the T-1000's random morphing and contortions were there to mess with the minds of the Connors. It was doing so because it was in a desperate and dire state, it knew it was about to be terminated and reacted accordingly. One could argue that when the T-1000 was frozen and reformed it introduced glitches. Such as a ripple running through its body (on two occasions). Or when its body started to fuse with random objects, such as the handrail or studded metal floor. Alternatively, this glitch may have made the T-1000 become more unstable and experiencing an emotional state that it previously did not experience in full.

quote:

Plus, even if you're correct, these would be very subtle developments and are nothing like the sheer arrogance that renders Skynet utterly incompetent in Salvation, 11 years earlier (technology wise). This makes me wonder whether you always thought the Terminators are emotive or whether the poor ending of Salvation (which you agree is a flawed film) has made you reassess T1 & T2 to give the concluding act more significance?


Yet Skynet managed to wipe out the hierarchy of the Resistance with one depth charge. It also led its nemesis to a carefully orchestrated trap. My reasons for thinking Terminator Salvation to be a flawed in parts, primarily revolves around characterisation and dialogue (which I noted to be a weakness of the writers). I wouldn't make connections from Terminator Salvation to the first two films for the sake of making the final scenes portentous. By virtue of the film's release it has renewed my interest in the franchise and made me look further into it. By doing so I have developed new insights and a new perspective on the series. By probing and 'researching' I have discovered material that has made me reevaluate the other films but also made me seriously question the things that before then, I had merely thought of as peculiar but never scrutinised.

quote:

I personally don't believe that the machines are emotive as this would mean they could potentially express compassion, which i don't think is in keeping with James Cameron's vision.


Yet you've missed the most significant development in Terminator 2. How the T-800 became self-aware and showed an empathy and compassion previously unheard nor considered. Remember what Sarah Connor said at the film's conclusion :-

An untold future lies ahead, and for the first time I face it with a sense of hope. For if a machine, a Terminator, can learn the value of human life; maybe we can too.

Furthermore, this indicates that this development is indeed part of James Cameron's vision for the Terminator. Here's an interesting extract from the Terminator Wiki site :-

James Cameron once said that Terminators are "already half-human" and likened the T-800 from T2 as the "Tin-man who got his heart". This theme of the "Tin-man" suggests that Terminators are already capable of developing their own sense of self, but they are required to discover this for themselves first. This is seen with the T-800.

I would have to verify if James Cameron did say those words (DVD commentary?). Although, I am convinced that what he depicted was intentional and no mere slip up. In the final scenes of Terminator 2. The T-800 comforts John Connor by gently touching his cheek and embracing him (where he even closes his eye in a very human manner). Now one could say, this is part of the T-800's advanced learning which has become incorporated into its programming. I.e. John Connor is upset ---> comfort ---> Typical human response :1. @#~[(
                                                                          2. &*()+*
                                                                          3. $£^/-+

However, for me there's far too much emotion displayed for it to be mere advanced 'infiltration' programming. Which would lead one to conclude these things are not merely shallow inclusions but a major revelation. Finally, let us not forget why Skynet introduced the read-only switch to the T-800s. They had the ability to become self-aware and become like Skynet. If they were to become self-aware it would impede the lethality of the T-800s if they were to wander off alone and start to "think" too much.




Emyr Thy King -> RE: Devin from CHUD reviews for Empire?? (7/6/2009 8:28:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: coljohnmatrix

I challenge anyone to read out Emyr Thy King's post on page 14. Without hearing the voice of Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons in your head reading the post out in your mind [;)]


I gave him the weekend off work.

This is far funnier [;)] :-

Link




captainrentboy -> RE: Terminator Salvation (7/6/2009 8:37:26 PM)

I thoroughly enjoyed the film, and agree with the 4 star review, infact it kept me more interested than Star Trek did, and wiped the floor with the slightly plop Wolverine. (All IMO of course)
After initially thinking ''Why the hell have they picked him to direct?'', I thought, when it was all over, that McG did a bang up job. Yes there are some slightly strange editing choices throughout (The film's opening with Marcus on death row was a particularly weak start) and it's all a rather bloodless affair for a 'War' movie, but I have to applaud the guy for knowing how to competently shoot an action scene without having the need to cut every 0.2 seconds. (Hello there Marc Forster) The 'one shot' looking Helicopter attack near the beginning and the whole Harverster sequence being my highlights.
Other than that I really liked Worthington, Bale was merely ok and didn't really bring that much to the film *Shout, shout, frown, frown*, and I thought the sound effects were top notch (Teeth rattling to the MAX) as was the CGI throughout.
No it didn't really live up to Cameron's first two, but who actually thought it would? But for a Terminator flick that had to, due to the film's setting, take such a detour from the usual Terminator movie plot, I thought it was a good effort.

Pity it's done soo badly, because I'm all up for another flick after seeing this newest entry. Ohh well.[&:]




Tech_Noir -> RE: Terminator Salvation (7/6/2009 8:54:03 PM)

I still can't get over how disappointed I was when Marcus' big origin reveal came up. I honestly was expecting something that would turn the whole Terminator universe upside down, instead it was just a standard plot device. It felt so... plain.




kumar -> RE: Terminator Salvation (7/6/2009 8:59:54 PM)

I liked it a lot. Christian Bales voice and the small kid were the only issues I had with it and i was prepared to look past them two. I really liked it, brilliant sound, good effects, really good action.






Ghidorah -> RE: Terminator Borenation (7/6/2009 9:37:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tech_Noir


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tech_Noir

I really hope there is an extended director's cut of this film because I'm sure there's a better version out there.

And I'm not just saying that because I wanna see Moon's boobies. [:D]


I don't think there was a love scene. There is a moment after Marcus and Blair meet when she is looking at her injury and Marcus goes off - I am pretty sure that is where that scene would be from as she is getting changed. The very next scene she is wearing something else - very odd cut.



Then her releasing Marcus was one of the daftest things in the movie.

Lack of character development made a lot of things in the film seem daft.

And giving Skynet lots of faces just reminded me of Star Trek 5!


One minute it was pissing down then the next second there wasn't a single drop.[:D]






James2183 -> RE: why (7/6/2009 10:36:18 PM)

I have to say that bar Shark Tale, Terminator Salvation has probably got to be the worst film I have seen at the cinema. If I spilled all my thoughts on this film my fingers would be bloody stumps by the time I got the end of them. So I shall be brief and use the wonder of bulletpoints. Spoilers ahoy

- The Script: I fail to believe that it took three people (which included Jonathan Nolan) to write the script. The story was full of cliche's and quite a bit of the dialogue was more heavy and clunky than the Terminators in the film. It's funny how a sterio turned up to full can alert the Terminator army yet a full scale assault on Marcus when he tries to escape doesn't.

- Bryce Dallas Howard: What is the point of her in the film? Is she Connor's wife/girlfriend or the bit on the side? You also have her bun in the oven that is never mentioned. Did she just get knocked up during production and the director just thought to leave it in.

- The action set pieces: From the trailer the action scenes looked pretty impressive yet during the film I was bored senseless. Loud explosions with fast cutting does not make a good action set piece.There was no tension or threat, whcih leads me to...

- The fact that they lost the menace and the threat of the Terminators that was present in the previous films. Not once during the film did the arrival of the Terminators bring about a sense of danger. Even when Bale was fighting and being pursued by the T-800 at the end did I feel worried for him. They seemed to have been turned into the henchmen you see in Kung Fu films before the arrival of the boss. (I would also like to know how the molten metal which kills both Terminators in T2 fails to destroy the T-800 in this one). It might be down to the fact that I still believe real puppets are still more realistic and believable than CGI characters for the most part but there was not one machine in this film that I was afraid of.

- The constant nods to the previous films. We don't need to hear "Come with me if you want to live" and "I'll be back" every time. The use of them in every film that follows the first just looks stupid and comedic, which when you consider how serious the film makes it out to be looks even more out of place.

- Christian Bale and his gruff voice. Did the guy have a sore throat throughout the film, or did he forget that he wasn't dressed up and fighting crime this time around? His voice as Batman was silly enough as it was, his constant husky voice in this was even more rediculous. I wonder if he sings happy birthday to his children in the same voice as it would appear he can't get rid of it. I would also like to know which scene he was rehearsing when the DoP walked in his line of sight, because all I ever saw was brooding Bale that didn't really reveal any emotion. It's probably down to the script but I would have liked to have seen the weight of the responsibility Connor has on his shoulders shown and see how he coped. In the end all we got was someone who pranced around like someone had stolen his toys.

I thought X-Men: Wolverine was going to be the worst film I would see this year. After Terminator Salvation I would gladly watch Wolverine a hundred times over before seeing this again.




Rgirvan44 -> RE: why (7/6/2009 10:45:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: James2183

I thought X-Men: Wolverine was going to be the worst film I would see this year. After Terminator Salvation I would gladly watch Wolverine a hundred times over before seeing this again.


Don't say things you can't take back. [:D]

As for Howard - she played the character that Claire Danes played in T3 and was Connors wife - you see that Bale is wearing the wedding ring.




hatebox -> RE: why (7/6/2009 10:52:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: James2183

I have to say that bar Shark Tale, Terminator Salvation has probably got to be the worst film I have seen at the cinema.



I didn't particularly like TS, but my word you've had a lucky cinema-going existence.




Emyr Thy King -> RE: why (7/6/2009 10:57:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: James2183
- The Script: I fail to believe that it took three people (which included Jonathan Nolan) to write the script. The story was full of cliche's and quite a bit of the dialogue was more heavy and clunky than the Terminators in the film. It's funny how a sterio turned up to full can alert the Terminator army yet a full scale assault on Marcus when he tries to escape doesn't.


The impression I had was that the Resistance base was rather remote (it seemed to be surrounded by trees and maybe water: a moat?).

quote:

- Bryce Dallas Howard: What is the point of her in the film? Is she Connor's wife/girlfriend or the bit on the side? You also have her bun in the oven that is never mentioned. Did she just get knocked up during production and the director just thought to leave it in.


I agree. She should have played a much larger role in the film. I also would have liked to see more intimacy between John and Kate Connor. In fact, in an interview Bryce Dallas Howard (who looked lovely) stated that she had given birth not long before filming Terminator Salvation. Since she remarked it was strange being pregnant and then 'acting' pregnant with a prosthetic bump. Kate Connor (née Brewster) was introduced in Terminator 3. Although, if you don't like the film and have a mental block towards it then it's understandable! Back to Bryce Dallas Howard, in the interview she looked more gaunt in the face. Where as in the film she looked to be carrying more weight in the face. Just an observation....

quote:

They seemed to have been turned into the henchmen you see in Kung Fu films before the arrival of the boss. (I would also like to know how the molten metal which kills both Terminators in T2 fails to destroy the T-800 in this one). It might be down to the fact that I still believe real puppets are still more realistic and believable than CGI characters for the most part but there was not one machine in this film of which I was afraid.


Terminators are merely Skynet's footsoldiers. Although their 'singular' appearance in previous films may be beguiling after one sees them in larger numbers! I strongly agree that I miss the puppet Terminators used at the beginning of Terminator 2. They do not need to be rendered in CGI.

quote:

- Christian Bale and his gruff voice. Did the guy have a sore throat throughout the film, or did he forget that he wasn't dressed up and fighting crime this time around? His voice as Batman was silly enough as it was, his constant husky voice in this was even more rediculous. I wonder if he sings happy birthday to his children in the same voice as it would appear he can't get rid of it. I would also like to know which scene he was rehearsing when the DoP walked in his line of sight, because all I ever saw was brooding Bale that didn't really reveal any emotion. It's probably down to the script but I would have liked to have seen the weight of the responsibility Connor has on his shoulders shown and see how he coped. In the end all we got was someone who pranced around like someone had stolen his toys.


For me I liked Christian Bale's shouting. Because usually he speaks quietly and rather aloofly. At least he seemed more animated in the film.




dwatermelon2006 -> RE: Fourquel (7/6/2009 10:58:36 PM)

I think generally empire get it spot on review and for terminator they were right they did there best for a film that didnt need to be made it is understandable that 3 wasn't a great finale but i felt this was not a terminator film but it had advanced to much it was to much of a large scale and rather epic an times to feel it continued the same story .




James2183 -> RE: why (7/6/2009 11:04:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rgirvan44
As for Howard - she played the character that Claire Danes played in T3 and was Connors wife - you see that Bale is wearing the wedding ring.


Ah yeah [:D]

I had totally blocked T3 out but would gladly exchange it for T:S




CORLEONE -> RE: Actually quite rubbish. (minor "plot" spoilers) (7/6/2009 11:12:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Olaf

He is pretty poor in everything except AP and The Prestige. Then you have to go all all the way back to Empire Of The Sun for a good performance.


Harsh Times.




darth silas -> RE: Very Good (8/6/2009 12:11:58 AM)

SPOILERS...

Just got back from seeing it and i freakin loved it! A really enjoyable sci-fi war flick.Didnt have much confidence in MCG but he really delivered here.The film has a great look and gritty tone.CGI fx and practical fx were excellent for the most part.The fight with the Harvester and extended truck/Mototerminator/HK chase were outstanding.

Sam Worthington doesnt appear on this evidence to be a great actor but theres no denying the fact that the man has got presence.

The final fight in the factory was truly exciting and the Arnold cameo was quality.There are plot holes(no way Connor should have survived that nuke at the start) but they werent enough to spoil the film.

Not quite as good as the first two films,but every bit as entertaining as the third.




adambatman82 -> RE: Terminator Borenation (8/6/2009 1:00:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tech_Noir

McG did a decent job it was the script and the rating restrictions that was the problem, nothing more.



someone else picked this point up on the slashfilm podcast, to which one of the other commentators pointed out that McG was the force at fault because he chose to work with the script. at the end of the day the responsibility was his. granted terminator salvation feels very much like a film made by commitee, but the final responsibility for the film surely ultimately comes down to the director, and if he wasnt happy working with the script he was given then he should have jumped ship? as he didnt i think he should accept the decision to work from that script as his own, and one that was ultimately the source of the films downfall.




adambatman82 -> RE: Very Good (8/6/2009 1:04:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHazman

Just got back form seeing this and really enjoyed it. Some amazing action and some good acting. Marcus was by far the best character and very enjoyable to watch. There were a few plot holes but, hey it s a film about robots and time travel. Any one who comapres this film to wolverrine is a chump becuase wolverine was one of the worst films i've seen in a long time and this was very good.


anyone who spells the word Wolverine differently twice in one sentence is surely the chump in this scenario?




mackey -> RE: Very Good (8/6/2009 1:21:25 AM)

McG is a lying prick.  How do I know this?  Amidst the usual splurge of promotional soundbites was his claim that Christian Bale only signed on due to the fact that the script had been sufficiently upgraded to enable it to be peformed on the stage.  Now obviously I realise that such utterances should be taken with a heaped spoon of salt yet McG's declaration, and indeed Bale's presence, got me thinking that the idea of a new Terminator film wasn't such a woeful idea afterall. 
McG was simply saying that there would be a good enough plot and sufficiently developed characters to provide the necessary emotional heft to ensure the audience could fully engage with the film.
There is nothing close to an original plotline in this film and there is nothing resembling a developed character in this film.  It is a stupefyingly awful attempt to revitalise a franchise that should have ended with Linda Hamilton's hopeful voiceover at the climax of T2. 
I love the first two Terminator films but I'm not so precious about them that I wouldn't welcome a truly original attempt at enlarging the mythology.  T3 was pretty poor but it did have a decent ending.  'Terminator Salvation' is lazy and uninspired from first second to last and everybody involved should truly be ashamed of themselves.  This may seem like an over-the-top opinion but the film is a complete travesty; not just as a 'Terminator' film but as a film full stop.
Following the absurd, woefully written, hilariously 'acted' prologue the film develops into a mire of hijacked ideas, bland set pieces and so-so special effects.  The problems are legion and there is no point in criticising them in detail any further.  Suffice to say that the lack of real, believable characters means that the film has no propulsive quality and it just ends up feeling sluggish and directionless. 
Everything about this mess reeks of a profoundly unimaginative bunch of film-makers but unfortunately this type of shoddy drivel seems to be the norm for sequels, remakes, re-imaginings and re-inventions. 
I went to see this on opening night at the same cinema, same screen, where I first saw T2 and the difference in audience reaction says it all.  During T2 there was unabashed cheering and clapping as the film poured out endless moments of brilliance and when it ended there was a thunderously positive ovation.  The only audience reactions at 'Terminator Salvation' were snorts of derision, disbelieving laughter and my mate snoring through the last 20 minutes (seriously).  Apart from that it was a deathly silence as jaws slowly dropped at the awfulness unfolding on screen.
Beyond terrible, 'Terminator Salvation' will surely be a leading contender for worst film of the year. 




Tech_Noir -> RE: Terminator Salvation (8/6/2009 6:30:58 AM)

Was I the only one who found it odd that John Connor jumps out of a chopper and swims down to a submarine at the start? Or did I miss something?




CORLEONE -> RE: Terminator Salvation (8/6/2009 9:00:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tech_Noir

Was I the only one who found it odd that John Connor jumps out of a chopper and swims down to a submarine at the start? Or did I miss something?


Well Arnie didn't tell him he drowned in the sea in Terminator 3 so I guess he figures he's ok [:D]

Anyhoo, he's the saviour of mankind. I assume he's ballsy!




James2183 -> RE: Terminator Salvation (8/6/2009 9:19:29 AM)

Spoilers below


I was more surprised that the Resistance didn't check over Marcus' body for any tracking devices. They already assumed that he was there to get into the base, yet didn't think to look him over for trackers. They did it to ever other Terminator they encountered in the film.




lloyddobler -> RE: Terminator Salvation (8/6/2009 9:31:40 AM)

**Spoilers**

I enjoyed this but not so much that I can look over its glaring flaws. The performances were all stiff and awkward and the script needed some major work. The less said about the final scene the better, two words - Hold Hands. Whilst I was watching it as well I was hearing Brad Fiedel's T2 score in my head because Danny Elfman's score was so average and just didn't fit with the movie. Anton Yelchin was good though. CGI Arnie - A mistake.

My major gripe with the film is that we get a sense that John Connor is a messiah like figure to some and a complete nut to others but they dont really expand on this enough and it leaves the character a little underdeveloped. The part where most of the resistance pockets round the world then refuse the strike on Skynet based purely on his radio ramblings doesnt make sense because of this. It just really grated on me on the drive home.

As a big summer film its got some cool action scenes but Star Trek and Drag Me To Hell are both far better films.




captainrentboy -> RE: why (8/6/2009 9:40:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: James2183

- The action set pieces: From the trailer the action scenes looked pretty impressive yet during the film I was bored senseless. Loud explosions with fast cutting does not make a good action set piece.There was no tension or threat, whcih leads me to...



Reeeally? I'm not having a go because you didn't like the film, that's your opinion.
But one of your negatives is one of the things I thought McG could be applauded for, I thought there were some pretty long shots throughout the action sequences, and that he directed this aspect of the movie particularly well. Other than Marcus' and Blair's escape from the Resistance base, which I thought was purposefully a bit shaky just to put across the franticness of it all, all of the action sequences showed exactly what was going on pretty darned clearly.[&:] Let's admit it here, this was no Quantum Of Solace.
But yes, there were a lot of explosions[:D] But simple guys like me appreciate big badda boooms.




Timon -> RE: why (8/6/2009 9:50:55 AM)

Well, I enjoyed it but I've put my review in Favorite Films in the Terminator thread simply because this place scares me but I will say this, it's a shame that it hasn't done well because in the studios mind, it's confirmed the moaning of fanboys that a Terminator film without Arnie doesn't work, which I personally think is bollocks.

Hopefully the DVD will expand upon a decent premise but I actually really enjoyed it, it just needed padding out.




Timon -> RE: why (8/6/2009 9:52:29 AM)

Well, I enjoyed it but I've put my review in Favorite Films in the Terminator thread simply because this place scares me but I will say this, it's a shame that it hasn't done well because in the studios mind, it's confirmed the moaning of fanboys that a Terminator film without Arnie doesn't work, which I personally think is bollocks.

Hopefully the DVD will expand upon a decent premise but I actually really enjoyed it, it just needed padding out.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.515625