|
Deviation -> RE: Intermissions (27/7/2008 4:50:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: badassmofo quote:
ORIGINAL: Caster If a film is over 3 hours I suppose it's ok but for LOTR I just found myself staying in my seat for ten minutes waiting to get back into the film, so for me its a complete waste of time. Same with Titanic. Go to the toilet before the film starts and don't stuff your face - seriously, why do people gulp down two pepsis and then leave to go to the bathroom at the most pivotal point in the movie? It's not rocket science. You had an intermission during Cloverfield? That film's 90 mins long! Sounds like they're just trying to rip you off there buddy. Cloverfield aint even 90 minutes long more like 75, thats a fucking joke having an intermission for it They always do it, ever since I was a little one, can't remember a film without intermission in the cinema. Yes, in Cloverfield it was a joke and I see no reason. Strangely though, goin to the cinema and not watching an intermission makes the film real awkward for me. The worse intermissions were in The Assasination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, it came in the moment where Jesse starts beating the kid, a great scene ruined. Another bad one was in Cloverfield, not put in a bad place but the second part was just 25 minutes long. On the bright side, there was a really good one in Indy 4, exactly before Indy and co. meet John Hurt for the first time in the Amazonian jungle.
|
|
|
|