|
magnusbarfod -> christ... (22/7/2008 7:22:53 PM)
|
both sides of this argument are pissing me off a little... someone below says McG's 'raping their childhood' and uses the 'he ruined charlies angels' angle...some perspective, please. hes not raping anything or anyone in any way, least of all your childhood, clarkkent, as you weren't even born when the first film came out according to your profile. and how you can "ruin" charlies angels" i have no fucking idea. theres nothing to ruin... And as for others saying "leave him alone, wait till the film comes out, judge him then..." well...no. that doesn't work either. this is a man with a proven track record of making mostly awful films. The Heath Ledger comparison raised by boriordan is equally as fatuous as clarkkents hyperbole...Ledger, at the time of casting in TDK had just turned in the strongest two performances of his career and was seen by most as a maturing talent about to step up to the next level (which it woulsdappear that he did with TDK) not really the same as giving a much loved franchise to a hack... so...i dont know what im saying really, just lets all shut up. the film will probably suck, but so what? just watch the first two again and forget about it. and if the signs such as bale joining the cast are indeed good...well, great. everyones a winner. but lets not lose perspective, people, on either side
|
|
|
|