Join Empire | Log In RSS  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  |  iPhone App
The Empire office TV is switched off. Empire Magazine
Search   
Empire Magazine
Join Empire
Get our free weekly newsletter

 
X-Files Season 1
Subscribe to Empire magazine today
Win A Dell XPS Laptop
Win a high-end PC courtesy of Dell Outlet

MORE EMPIRE FEATURES ›
The Men Who Played Jason Voorhees
We profile the actors and stuntmen who portrayed the iconic horror legend - and what became of them...
Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Back
Page 3 of 9
Next
Richard Brooker | Richard Brooker as Voorhees in Friday The 13th Part III.
PICTURED Richard Brooker as Voorhees in Friday The 13th Part III.


Richard Brooker
Appeared in: Friday The 13th Part III

The first Jason to wear the hockey mask - in full-on, clumsily composed 3D no less (look! A yo-yo!) - Brooker's Jason is, inexplicably, bigger and stronger than the Jason from Part 2, despite the fact that barely a day has elapsed between instalments. Anyhoo, he's also one mean sonuvabitch, stabbing people in the stomach with pitchforks, shooting people in the eye with a harpoon gun and, in the movie's most gruesome moment, grabbing someone's head and squeezing it until their eyeball comes atcha... much like Cleopatra.

What happened next?
As with so many of the screen Jasons, Brooker - a 54 year-old London-born actor - doesn't have a glowing CV. In fact, he has only two more credits - 1983's Deathstalker and 1987's Deep Sea Conspiracy. Unlike most other screen Jasons, though, Brooker has an excuse. He gave up acting to pursue a career producing and directing daily TV shows, and was last seen running his own web design company.

Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Back
Page 3 of 9
Next

Advertisement

Have Your Say
Does Jason Voorhees still send a shiver down your spine after all these years? Which Friday the 13th movie gets your vote? Register or login now to have your say.

Your Comments
1 RE: not sure about the new one
Posted on Tuesday February 17, 2009, 13:45 by Ghost Mutt
Probably be quite boring but due to the complete Jason experience being the sum of all it's parts - mother's killings, pillow case, hockey mask, supernatural aspects - I would have loved to have seen a film which contained the finest moments from a frankly torrid franchise.   But that's just me.  Read More

2 RE: not sure about the new one
Posted on Tuesday February 17, 2009, 02:48 by tommyjarvis
L: steveohim i am a huge friday the 13th fan,went to see the new one last night and although good,im thinking the writters just didnt watch any of the originals.firstly jason does not run in any of the movies execpt briefly in part 3,he did more running in this one than lingford christie,secondly jason does not keep people hostage he basically kills whoever he meets there and then.and thirdly jason does not live in a nice little log cabin.i like to think of him as living in the lake.you dont see where he goes in any of the previous movies.this one is like the voorhees version of cribs for fucks sake.i dont think the ppl behind this movie done there research sp; What does it matter what Jason did in the originals? A remake needs to do things its own way to have any identity. Besides, Jason ran in parts 2, 3 and 4, before he became supernatural.   Good article. I was never that much of a Kane Hodder fan anyway, much preferred his earlier incarnations. Read More

3 Did....
Posted on Sunday February 15, 2009, 19:43 by I Went Down
...the work experience kid write this piece of shit? Read More

4 not sure about the new one
Posted on Saturday February 14, 2009, 12:52 by steveohim
i am a huge friday the 13th fan,went to see the new one last night and although good,im thinking the writters just didnt watch any of the originals.firstly jason does not run in any of the movies execpt briefly in part 3,he did more running in this one than lingford christie,secondly jason does not keep people hostage he basically kills whoever he meets there and then.and thirdly jason does not live in a nice little log cabin.i like to think of him as living in the lake.you dont see where he goes in any of the previous movies.this one is like the voorhees version of cribs for fucks sake.i dont think the ppl behind this movie done there research Read More

5 RE: Extraordinarily awful?
Posted on Friday February 13, 2009, 15:19 by bbX1138
Agreed. I also really rate Freddy Vs Jason. It's a shame the writers of FvJ didn't show the same imagination and flair for the rubbish Jason reboot. Read More

6 RE: Extraordinarily awful?
Posted on Friday February 13, 2009, 14:50 by NunianVonFuch
Also lets not forget that upon it's cinematic release Empire's Kim Newman gave Jason X a (fully deserved in my opinion) 4 Stars saying: "Wittily scripted, smartly directed and well-played by an unfamiliar cast, this is a real treat for all those who have suffered through the story so far." How anyone can say it's worse than 7,8 or 9 is beyond me. It's the only one of them all that I can watch with friends, or more than once at all for that matter! Read More

7 Extraordinarily awful?
Posted on Friday February 13, 2009, 12:36 by oldstuff
Jason X was the best of the Friday 13th movies because it actually managed to breath some life into a pretty dead franchise. Read More


Back | Print This Page | Email This Page | Back To Top

EXCLUSIVE OFFERS
Free X-Files Season 1
Free when you subscribe to Empire
Subscribe Today »
Magazine Special Offers
Special offers on your favourite magazines
Latest Offers »
The Empire iPhone App
Every Empire film review at your fingertips
Click here »
 
Movie News  |  Empire Blog  |  Movie Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Video Interviews  |  Image Gallery  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Magazine  |  Resources  |  Free Movies
 
Mojo4music  |  Q4Music  |  Kerrang!  |  Aloud.com  |  Kiss
 
© Bauer Consumer Media | Terms And Conditions | Our Data Promise To You | Contact Us | Empire FAQ
Bauer Consumer Media. Company number 1176085 (England). Registered Office: 21 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2DY