Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
The 301 Greatest Movies Of All Time!
Empire's Guardians Of The Galaxy Cover
Does Star Wars Have A Brain Trust?
Nick Frost:
My Movie Life

The World's End star's pick of the flicks
Subscribe: 6 Issues For £15!
Subscribe today and save 37% off the cover price!
Feature
Star Wars Episode VII: What It Means
We run the rule over Disney and the future of the Force

submit to reddit

WORDS HELEN O'HARA
1
  1 of 1  

George Luacs and Samuel L. Jackson on the set of Revenge Of The Sith

THE LAST FEW YEARS HAVE BEEN AN UNCERTAIN TIME FOR STAR WARS. Revenge Of The Sith finished the prequel trilogy in style but without the triumphant flourish and lingering high that many had longed for. For seven years we lived in a world where Star Wars as a movie property had been left behind, abandoned like a once-beloved childhood toy whose colours have faded. The franchise lived on through games, toys and the (admittedly good) Clone Wars animated series but the saga had come to a close and we were the poorer for it. That all changed today, however, with the news that Disney has bought Lucasfilm and plans on releasing Episode VII in 2015.

George Lucas made it clear after Sith that, whatever he may have said in the past, he had no intention of starting work on a new cinematic trilogy to follow on from Return Of The Jedi – nor would he abandon the series into someone else’s hands. That was probably the right decision for the time: overblown accusations of childhood-rape and money-grabbing were already rife from entitled fanboys, and had Lucas handed over the reins he would have faced further accusations of cashing in. Now, however, we’ve had a little time to miss the franchise, and things look a little different. There is no cause to think that every future Star Wars film should underwhelm, or just whelm, as the prequels did. There is, in fact, every reason to hope that Episode VII – and whatever follows it – could be not only good but truly great. The success of Avatar surely demonstrated a hunger for space opera that’s currently being ignored by studios chasing after fantasy dollars. We can argue about whether superhero movies like Thor and The Avengers qualify as sci-fi (they probably do, just) but they’re not Star Wars. That gap in the market is in the same place it ever was, and while studios cast about for “the next Harry Potter” Disney may end up looking extremely smart for turning back to the one proven space franchise.

The input of new blood could be exactly what this franchise needs.
Those fanboys who have – rather unfairly– become rabidly anti-Lucas can take comfort from the fact that the director has stepped back from the reins of power, handing Lucasfilm first to Kathleen Kennedy and now to Disney. There should be no question that Lucas can make great movies (stop carping at the back: if he hadn’t made two or three great Star Wars films you wouldn’t be so angry at him now), but his very best efforts on Star Wars have seen him collaborate with other people. Lawrence Kasdan in particular, as screenwriter on Episodes V and VI, and director Irvin Kershner on Episode V, improved the dialogue and tightened the character scenes. The input of new blood could be exactly what this franchise needs. It’s one of those cases where the retirement of the original creator need not derail the franchise as a whole, and should make the fans happier rather than discontent.

WHAT'S ALSO INTERESTING IS WHERE LUCAS HAS CHOSEN TO PLACE HIS BABY. Disney has gone on something of a spending spree in the past few years, buying Pixar for $7bn and Marvel for about the same price as this Lucasfilm deal, $4bn. It’s easy to make a kneejerk assumption that this big business is up to no good, but the evidence simply doesn’t support it. Disney are big, no question, but the fit is a pretty logical one. Disney has had dealings with Lucas for years – see the theme park rides, for instance – and has recently been focusing on exactly the same sort of family audience that the original films catered to. Disney’s not just a place for cutesy cartoons these days; their meat and potatoes are films like Pirates Of The Caribbean and, lest we forget, Avengers. Those films show a mix of comedy, action, peril and adventure that could have come straight from the Star Wars playbook.

But far more significant is this: Disney has emphatically not tried to fit its new acquisitions into a corporate model of doing business. If anything, in the case of Pixar, the influence has gone quite the other way, with Disney bringing Pixar’s John Lasseter back to the Mouse House to revive their struggling animation department (and head their Imagineers, and develop their direct-to-DVD franchises) while leaving Pixar’s culture more or less untouched. With Marvel, too, there’s no sense that Kevin Feige is being second guessed as he crafts out Phase Two of the Avengers’ joint and individual adventures. When a culture has been working, Disney has left it to work. The worst you can say about the studio is that they place quite a bit of emphasis on ancillary rights, by which measure Cars is a more successful Pixar movie than Up, but as long as the toy selling and theme parks don’t materially affect the content of films, if you don’t like that stuff just don’t buy it and you’ll be fine. Besides which Star Wars fans, of all people, can hardly complain about over-commercialisation or toylines inspired by their films.

Whether Lucasfilm can be said to be a culture that is working right now is up for debate, but the signs today are that there’s a sense of purpose and movement that were lacking in the stagnant years since Sith, when the TV show was stalled for budgetary reasons and only the Clone Wars cartoon continued to fly the flag. Kathleen Kennedy took over as co-chair of Lucasfilm in June, and now becomes its president. Judging by her CV to date, and her long history of collaborating with Lucas on the Indiana Jones if not the Star Wars franchise, she should have a pretty clear idea where she’s headed. She’s also a woman with a passionate commitment to storytelling, which should rule out much talk of trade embargoes and taxes.

Robert A. Iger, chairman and CEO, The Walt Disney Company, and George Lucas, chairman and founder, Lucasfilm sign the agreement for The Walt Disney Company to acquire Lucasfilm Ltd.

FIRST UP FOR DISNEY-LUCASFILM, OF COURSE, IS EPISODE VII. Lucas said last night that he had mapped out a treatment for three more films, but didn’t claim that he was writing the screenplays. Kennedy now has to assemble a creative team to get those moving forward – and we suspect she’ll have her pick of Hollywood’s best screenwriters and directors. After all, virtually every director and screenwriter currently at the height of their career grew up on Star Wars, because the vast majority of successful filmmakers overlap precisely with Lucas’s fanbase: geeks in their thirties and forties. Star Wars was seismic in its influence, formative in its effects on filmmakers, and we doubt there can be more than two or three directors in the whole of town who wouldn’t start drooling at the prospect of playing in that universe (the arthouse guys might not admit it, but come on! Everyone secretly wants a lightsaber). If Orson Welles called RKO Studios “the biggest electric train set a boy could have”, Disney just bought the biggest, most mouth-watering collection of classic action figures ever assembled.

The great strength of the Star Wars films was their strong sense of good vs. evil, and that needs to stay in place.
Immediately after the announcement, Twitter went mental with directorial suggestions. The most popular name, Joss Whedon, has the small matter of Avengers 2 due the same year, so barring an attempt to get himself fired so he can take over Star Wars instead (a risky strategy, given that they’re both at the same studio) he’s out of the running. Brad Bird’s name has been bandied about (Kennedy’s story-focus would certainly gel well with Pixar alums), and Andrew Stanton’s (whether he’d want to tackle sci-fi for Disney again so soon is up for debate), but why stop there? At the risk of blowing the internet’s collective mind, consider this: Christopher Nolan has a gap in his schedule right now. David Fincher hasn’t got anything listed for 2015. Sam Mendes is on a post-Skyfall break. Danny Boyle’s probably nearly recovered from the Olympics by now. Name a director, and the chances are Disney can at least sit down and discuss the prospect with him. Steven Spielberg should’ve finished Robopocalypse before 2015, right? (For the record, we don’t think that’s likely.)

The same goes for writers – and if you get a great writer and director lined up, the cast will follow. Which brings us to thornier questions of plot and setting. We suspect that any attempt to recast Han, Luke and Leia (particularly Han) would be fraught. While Nathan Fillion is an acceptable Solo substitute, he is not actually Han Solo. Nor is Ryan Reynolds, or Aaron Eckhart, or anyone else we can think of.

But failing to recast that trio means that you face issues of setting. Without them, you either move to the outskirts of the fallen Empire and tell a smaller story set around the same time, or you have to move into the future. The past is right out because a) the word “prequel” is still franchise poison for this series and b) calling it Episode VII and setting it in the past would really upset the OCD among us. So we’re talking a good 30 to 40 years later as a minimum, which could mean that the original cast appear in smaller roles, or not at all if it’s set much further into the future than that. Either way, the new film will have a bit of a job of world-building to do in order to re-establish this new time period or setting, so it will need a great script. Or, at the very least, a killer opening crawl.

Were it up to us (and unaccountably, Disney is yet to call) we’d ground these new films around a Jedi / Sith clash – albeit not necessarily with only Jedi and Sith leads. The great strength of the Star Wars films was not their moral ambiguity but their strong sense of good vs. evil, and that needs to stay in place. There’s still a wealth of story that can be built around such a monumental conflict, and there’s still room for Han Solo-like unaligned figures in-between the goody-two-shoes Jedi and their dark foes, but if there were no Jedi or Sith we might as well be in any old space opera.

THE FILM ALSO NEEDS TO DISTINGUISH ITSELF FROM AVATAR, FROM JOHN CARTER, AND FROM ITS OWN PREQUELS. Our suggestion would be that one way to do that is to keep CG to a minimum and try to use as many practical effects as possible. For one, it will distinguish Episode VII from the sometimes CG-slap happy prequels. For another, it will recall the original films. For a third, the fans will love that stuff; look at the Nolan Batman films.

At this stage, of course, such questions are entirely speculative and are likely to remain so for a good few months to come. But there can be no question that this is a big day for Star Wars, for Lucasfilm, and for Disney, which has cemented its status as a studio built to cater for huge franchises along without necessarily churning them all out in its own image. As discussed here, Disney is focusing its business plan on a few huge films a year rather than a slate of mid-level contenders, and to do that it needs exactly this sort of mega- franchise to build upon. It’s a high risk (John Carter), high reward (Avengers) tactic, but as long as they pursue this plan by focusing on making great films, it should be of basically no interest to those outside the business. Admittedly, inside the business it’s pretty seismic. Warners, having wrapped up its big earner with the end of Harry Potter and facing a Batman reboot on Justice League, suddenly faces a challenger as the biggest franchise producer in town; the other studios will be looking closely at Disney’s plan and, we suspect, largely fitting in their own releases to fit in around these behemoths rather than trying to grab the same turf.

Because let’s face it: everyone’s going to be interested in a new Star Wars movie. You can be as cynical as you want about the chances of it matching up to what’s gone before; you can doubt Lucas’s continued involvement, however minor, if you like; you can swear you’ll boycott it and that Jar-Jar Binks shot JR before ruining your childhood. But you’re still going to want it to succeed. It’s Star Wars, people, and it’s coming back.

Today is a good day.
 

1
 
1 of 1
 

Have Your Say
Register or login now to let us know what you think.

Your Comments

1 Music
One guy I've not heard being mentioned much and who in my eyes ( and ears) is a critical ingredient to the new Star Wars films and that would be John Williams. I guess it stands to reason that he would be involved? More

Posted by Martypants on Sunday November 11, 2012, 00:22

2
Total tangent, but... In my massively self-regarding opinion, Disney's first step should be to release Super Definitive Collectors Ultimate Edition boxsets of each of the original trilogy, Bladerunner style, including the original theatrical versions, digitally remastered widescreen versions, special edition, I dunno a working print... George Lucas may consider each new iteration to be the 'proper' version of the film, but people tend to like some choice in these matters - it's the difference between being offered a cappuccino and being told you can't buy a cup of black coffee. That would help heal the rift between Lucas and Star Wars fans and make a big old pile of money to fund all the new Star Wars rides at Disney theme parks. PS: I took up the middle class hobby du jour and stared a blog. This is a shameless plug (insert Wayne Rooney joke here) for it, but I recast Star Wars A New Hope. Check it out... http://froodianpseudoanalysis.wordpress.com Two words: ChriMore

Posted by DrSFrood on Saturday November 10, 2012, 23:41

3 Episode 7: A New Hope
The director should be Genndy Tartakovsky. For two reasons http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VB_vjVxcic& ;feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2b8je vcX4c Failing that, i'd give it Sandy Collora More

Posted by bnicholson50 on Tuesday November 6, 2012, 22:41

4
Totally agree with 'richardpettet'; you cannot replace Han Solo...I know all the arguments about the Star Trek reboot but c'mon...there are certain films you simply CANNOT remake and recasting is just one step away from remaking (or rebooting!) Star Trek was reworked for years through countless interpretations on TV so recasting was not so big a deal in my view. Plus, controversially, Star Trek never really produced true copper bottomed classics (sorry about the Alan Partridge reference) the way that Star Wars did (ie IV and V) Its all very well 'rebooting' Batman or remaking the Hitcher but even Hollywood surely knows some films cannot be touched; a new Jaws anyone? A new Godfather? A rebooted Star Wars? No thanks. Harrison Ford IS Han Solo; everyone else is just pretending in the school yard. More

Posted by echofalls on Sunday November 4, 2012, 18:37

5 DGA
Hopefully Disney will hammer out an agreement with the DGA and get the opening credits terms cancelled that wouldn't allow Spielberg to direct any of the prequels. I can't see them getting rid of the opening crawl so unless the DGA relents the choice of available directors will be somewhat limited. More

Posted by 99intheshade on Saturday November 3, 2012, 17:27

6 RE: A New(er) Hope
"...the one proven space series..." This statement is illogical, as a pointy-eared, green-blooded half-breed might say. More

Posted by homersimpson_esq on Saturday November 3, 2012, 08:10

7 A New(er) Hope
I used to be the biggest Star Wars geek in this or any other galaxy, until the prequels leached the fanboy essence from my veins like so many dissipating midichlorians. (Ugh.) Revenge of the Sith was the worst of the lot, not just because it was stupid and pointless and had no emotional resonance whatsoever (all three prequels were like that), but also because it felt like a betrayal: as the final chapter of the saga, it was supposed to be, to use Obi-Wan Kenobi's words, "our last hope." I was so disgusted with Star Wars that I gave away-- yes, GAVE AWAY-- all the toys, books, and games in my considerable collection. And now, after reading Helen O-Hara's brilliant article-- whatever you're paying her, Empire, it's not enough-- I know that Sith WASN'T our last hope, after all. To quote Yoda, "There is another." At least three more, in fact. And for the first time in many years, I'm wondering if I can get some of my Star Wars stuff back... More

Posted by intelandroid on Saturday November 3, 2012, 02:58

8 RE: well said
L: clownfoot L: Dr Science I appreciate the distinction but I still don't think I can separate myself from the group that you're criticising. I have never been so angry and sad after watching a film as I was after TPM. It still hurts. Irrational maybe, but it's a valid emotional truth. im? es - Spaced was a documentary. More

Posted by Dr Science on Friday November 2, 2012, 16:36

9 Good point,Well Made
Nicely done. 'Nuff Said More

Posted by bruciebonus on Friday November 2, 2012, 14:17

10 RE: well said
L: Dr Science I appreciate the distinction but I still don't think I can separate myself from the group that you're criticising. I have never been so angry and sad after watching a film as I was after TPM. It still hurts. Irrational maybe, but it's a valid emotional truth. im? More

Posted by clownfoot on Friday November 2, 2012, 13:52

11 Break away from the original series.
Anyone out there read Isaac Asimov's Foundation books? If not, you should definately check them out. They feature a lot of space travel, great characters, and unexpected plot twists. Not only that, they cover hundreds of years of intergalactic history over a series of seven books. It is also interesting to note that the books contain elements very similar tho those in the Star Wars universe. There is a Character called Han Pritcher, and a Capital planet called Trantor which is very similar to Coruscant. I would put money on this series of books being a direct influence on Lucas's Star Wars vision. But my point is this: Star Wars covers a hundred or so years of history, and with the comics and games you can go a few years back or forwards in time (fanboys will no doubt have this info), so why not, like the Foundation series, take a bold move and go four to five hundred years into the future, wiping the slate clean and paving the way for more adventures? It would be a time when More

Posted by xxghostbusterxx on Friday November 2, 2012, 12:02

12 Break away from the original series.
Anyone out there read Isaac Asimov's Foundation books? If not, you should definately check them out. They feature a lot of space travel, great characters, and unexpected plot twists. Not only that, they cover hundreds of years of intergalactic history over a series of seven books. It is also interesting to note that the books contain elements very similar tho those in the Star Wars universe. There is a Character called Han Pritcher, and a Capital planet called Trantor which is very similar to Coruscant. I would put money on this series of books being a direct influence on Lucas's Star Wars vision. But my point is this: Star Wars covers a hundred or so years of history, and with the comics and games you can go a few years back or forwards in time (fanboys will no doubt have this info), so why not, like the Foundation series, take a bold move and go four to five hundred years into the future, wiping the slate clean and paving the way for more adventures? It would be a time when More

Posted by xxghostbusterxx on Friday November 2, 2012, 11:54

13 P.s Han Solo
On the whole debate surrounding the coolest cat in the galaxy, and who would play him. It can be only one man in my opinion. Cool, calm, funny, attractive and dangerous..... Mr Ryan Gosling. More

Posted by JohnMcClane81 on Friday November 2, 2012, 10:29

14 Briliant.
This has the hairs on the back of my neck standing up and applauding. Fantastic article Empire. Bravo. More

Posted by JohnMcClane81 on Friday November 2, 2012, 10:27

15
Richard in reply to your comment about no other actor being able to play Han Solo weren´t Star Trek fanboys saying the same thing about Kirk and Spock before the Star Trek reboot ? I´d say that turned out pretty well and proved the fanboys totally wrong. Maybe you are right that no other actor will be quite as good at playing Han Solo as Harrison Ford was but it doesn´t mean that another actor won´t do a damn fine job of it. More

Posted by elmorello on Friday November 2, 2012, 09:52

16 Totally new characters please
I think Helen is right about not recasting the original leads. For me, as an aforementioned mid thirties fanboy, Han Solo is the symbol of the original trilogy. Empire was the first film I ever saw in the cinema, and the carbonite scene was pretty much all I remembered about it. For a confused 4 year old it was pretty upsetting. But from that point on Han Solo was my hero. Who didn't want to be Han Solo right? and that meant wanting to be Harrison Ford. The fact that he is also Indiana Jones just puts him on a different level, even in comparison to the Connery/Bond scenario, so as a result I'd be irrationally predisposed to not liking the new Han. He might be a fantastic actor. He might play the character really well. But we wouldn't be Harrison Ford and so he wouldn't be Han Solo. Irrational comments over.... More

Posted by richardpettet on Friday November 2, 2012, 08:39

17 Why not new actors for Han Solo and Luke ?
I disagree with this Empire article when it says that new actors shouldn´t be used to play Han and Luke ? Why not ? We saw how well using new actors to play Kirk and Spock worked in the Star Trek reboot. Why should we be denied seeing the continuation of these characters and their story just because the original actors are too old to play them now ? Move with the times surely. More

Posted by elmorello on Thursday November 1, 2012, 23:40

18 RE: HRH HOH
A only-slightly left field suggestion for Director? Duncan Jones. More

Posted by Moonbucket on Thursday November 1, 2012, 18:56

19 HRH HOH
Helen O'Hara - legend. Should be made a Queen. And not one of those whiny ones who watch their people suffer and die while bureaucrats discuss trade sanctions in a committee. Agree with the piece - had identical thoughts on the corporate analysis and think some people are focusing too much on possible Disnification (given the way post-Eisner acquisitions of Pixar and Marvel Studios have panned out so far). You've also used a turn of phrase that I do sometimes - what does whelm mean, exactly? Suspect reading Empire has rubbed off on me over prolonged period. More

Posted by rwoo on Thursday November 1, 2012, 17:07

20 RE: well said
I appreciate the distinction but I still don't think I can separate myself from the group that you're criticising. I have never been so angry and sad after watching a film as I was after TPM. It still hurts. Irrational maybe, but it's a valid emotional truth. It took Tartakovsky to provide me with a measure of catharsis. They should definitely have him on the shortlist for directors of Episode VII. More

Posted by Dr Science on Thursday November 1, 2012, 16:34

Next Page

SPECIAL FEATURE
The 301 Greatest Movies Of All Time EMPIRE READERS' POLL: THE 301 GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME
You turned out in your hundreds and thousands, and here are the results... Browse the full list


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
'I Have The Club But I Didn't Get The Lion's Head'
Dwayne Johnson (and pals) talks Hercules props, action and ancient superheroes

Classic Feature: The Making Of The Silence Of The Lambs
Is this the most frightening movie ever made?

Classic Feature: Jack Nicholson - Gods Among Us
Charisma, consistency and cunning summed up in a single word: Jack.

Director Matt Reeves Spills Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes Secrets
What we learned from our Empire podcast spoiler special

Peter Fonda On Peter Fonda
The Hollywood legend relives his career highlights

Kevin Feige Talks Ant-Man, Guardians Of The Galaxy And Doctor Strange
The Marvel boss updates us on the state of his cinematic universe

Video: Gary Oldman And Keri Russell Talk Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes
Would you watch Carry On Up The Planet Of The Apes?

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get The 301 Greatest Movies Of All Time Subscribers' Cover

Subscribe today and get the cover and 3 issues for only £10!

Subscribe today

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save maney on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Get 6 issues of Empire for just £15!
Get the world's greatest movie magazine delivered straight to your door! Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)