Why Is Found Footage So Scary?
 Posted on Thursday September 9, 2010, 18:00 by Ali Plumb in Empire States
 The Last Exorcism is the latest in an increasingly long line of ‘found footage’ horror films, a film fad kicked off (in its modern form) by The Blair Witch Project and kept alive by the likes of Romero’s Diary Of The Dead, the excellent Spanish zombie series [REC] and more recently the bed-shaking Paranormal Activity, the ooglie-booglie Cloverfield and the little green men-filled ‘documentary’ The Fourth Kind.
But what is it exactly that makes the found footage phenomenon so damn scary, even now? For a fad, it’s been around for a good while, and with the success of The Last Exorcism ($33 million plus so far in the US), it’s definitely still got legs. So what is it about it that still makes us shake in our seats? And though I’m no Kim Newman (and I’m really, really not), here are my two cents. Ready? Here goes:
1. Lack of horror sign posting. By-the-book horrors can be read like a map – you just know when the blood will hit the windscreen, when the trap door will burst open, when the supporting character’s bitchy girlfriend will get decapitated. With found footage, nothing is safe, anything could happen, and the audience knows it.
2. A genuine suspension of disbelief. Becoming fully immersed in a movie is next to impossible now – perhaps we’re just too cynical, or maybe we’ve just watched too many movies (or both), but there’s always a clear distance between the viewer and the film. The fact that the footage was ‘found’, that the characters use equipment you could get your hands on, as well as the less forced, more natural dialogue… all these rough edges make it all the more ‘real’ and all the scarier.
3. The first person aspect. Almost like a first person shooter, you see just what their eyes can see (for the most part, anyway). [REC] 2 even uses multiple head-cams to great effect, and because of this acknowledgement of the cameras instead of pretending they don’t exist, the audience lives in, and through the camera. Its footage, its sound, that’s all you’ve got. The atmosphere becomes electric, the camcorder sacrosanct, almost. The Last Exorcism even uses it as a weapon, making you complicit in the act – and after that, how can you not be involved with the story?
4. Unknown actors. The unknown names not only add to the believability of the whole horrific ordeal, but also a certain refreshing intimacy. These are just… people. Not Johnny Depp (who is a God, of course) – but people. You know, you. [REC], Blair Witch, Paranormal Activity and use this very well, Cloverfield less so as many actors were more recognisable – but, most importantly, not too recognisable. In Psycho and Scream, the lead draw was killed in the first 20 minutes. Now, there are no lead draws – and anyone could die, at any time.
5. Darkness and light. Cloverfield and [REC] play around with the green-tastic night-vision brilliantly – the monster fleas in the subway and the famous final shot of the original [REC] prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt – but more than just night vision, the fact that Blair Witch made us all wet ourselves using a bit of paint, some twigs and the cover of night shows that a careful use of atmospherics, well-built up tension, and the sound of heavy breathing (and crying) can make a completely black screen the scariest thing in the world.
What draws us out of this found footage love-in, for my part, is not only the gimmicky nature of the tricks discussed, but the music. The scariest thing in a good horror movie is well-timed, well-written music at a climactic moment, all sharp strings and booming drums. It builds up the pressure and shocks those hiding behind their hands to sit up and have the crap scared out of them.
But with found footage horrors, when this happens – as it does in The Last Exorcism – this extra-diegetic music clangs a bit, and undoes the good work that the film’s been doing getting you involved with the story. Instead of thinking “Aiiiiiiiiiiiiii!” you end up thinking “Where’s that racket coming from? There’s a girl covered in blood clinging to the ceiling and someone’s practising their violin.” Or something along those lines, anyway.
Then there’s the whole ‘how do they / we find this footage anyway’ conundrum. Cloverfield makes this apparent from the start (though it does imply that everyone you get to know will die, annoyingly), and Paranormal Activity, The Fourth Kind and the like are pretty self-explanatory but [REC] – well, who went into the building full of zombies to pick that tape up, then? To be honest, though it’s a tiny thing, it can niggle at you throughout the movie – unless, of course, the sequel clears that all up nicely.
But what have I missed? What are the other found footage tropes that still have legs? And do we want another found footage spooking, or is the more traditional format still king? Go forth and comment. Immediately.
Login or register to comment.
Advertisement
Comments
| 1 |
sephiroth7 Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 11:00
Except, it doesn't work. |
|
| 2 |
bigcado Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 11:54
Cant forget Cannibal Holocaust. 'Found Footage' was so authentic the director faced murder charges. |
|
| 3 |
billythehick Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 13:19
You forgot to mention Diary of The Dead: an absolute lesson on everything NOT to put in your footage movie. |
|
| 4 |
jujubeans Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 13:48
Like a lot of things these days, what was new and exciting has gotten old and cliched. There are tropes to found-footage now, it has become a genre with rules: a night-vision bit, a bit where someone has to have that unconvincing "why are you filming everything?"-"the people have to know what happened here" conversation, a bit where the camera falls to the floor and you're left wondering what has happened to the cameraman...
Its a pity, because what it boils down to is that is was a good trick that let new talent make horror films extremely cheaply. I think cannibal holocaust and blair witch shook me up a heck of a lot, whereas with diary of the dead and paranormal activity came familiarity.
One thing I still do like about it tho is that its anti-cinema in a way. In paranormal activity, you have to search in the corners for what it is you're supposed to see. Normally you're shown whatever it is you need to be aware of through cuts and close-ups: in found-footage you have to peer through the dark... |
|
| 5 |
Jack'sSmirkinRevenge Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 13:53
Billythehick - see paragraph 1. You are right though, it was shite. I thought Paranormal Activity was pretty 'meh', but I loved The Blair Witch and Cloverfield. For me though, the Rec series were amazing, mainly for the reasons in the blog, and I can't wait for the 3rd. You're just so immersed in them. |
|
| 6 |
albumental Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 14:26
@ sephiroth
According to who? Rec was excellent and would not have been as compelling if shot in a more conventional style. Blair Witch I still find an exciting watch (for the most part) and it's failings aren't with the first person / hand-held style in my opinion but rather with a lack of momentum in the plot. |
|
| 7 |
paulantrobus Posted on Friday September 10, 2010, 16:20
the last exorcism was ruined by the music as far as i'm concerned. it drags you out of the film. there is none in blair witch, cloverfield, rec, paranormal activity
god knows why they did it |
|
| 8 |
chenqinjk Posted on Saturday September 11, 2010, 00:55
our website :[www.popbuynow.com]
(b..r..a..n..d.)s.h.o.e.s.(34u.s.d),,
==J. a .m .e )) shoes
(1-24) shoes
2010 shoes
c.l.o.t.h.i.n.g,,j.e.a.n,,h.a.n.d.b.a.g(35u.s.d),,
==c .o. a .c .h )) handbag
(f.r.e.e)s.h.i.p.p.i.n.g
[www.popbuynow.com] [www.popbuynow.com ] |
|
| 9 |
chenqinjk Posted on Saturday September 11, 2010, 00:58
our website :[www.popbuynow.com]
(b..r..a..n..d.)s.h.o.e.s.(34u.s.d),,
==J. a .m .e )) shoes
(1-24) shoes
2010 shoes
c.l.o.t.h.i.n.g,,j.e.a.n,,h.a.n.d.b.a.g(35u.s.d),,
==c .o. a .c .h )) handbag
(f.r.e.e)s.h.i.p.p.i.n.g
[www.popbuynow.com] [www.popbuynow.com ] |
|
| 10 |
Lemure Posted on Saturday September 11, 2010, 11:51
It makes no difference. A scary film is a scary film no matter what the format. This is like saying 3D animation is better than 2D animation. Cloverfield wasn't successful because it was hand-held, it was successful because of great marketing. Diary of the Dead and The Fourth Kind were terrible. Blair Witch was good - but again a lot of it was thanks to marketing. Paranormal Activity scared the shit out of me, but NOT because of the format. Let's also bear in mind that "found-footage" doesn't always work. I walked out of Diary of the Dead because I got sick of seeing people getting attacked while the cameraman just stood there watching. |
|
| 11 |
elleisme Posted on Saturday September 11, 2010, 12:35
I have to disagree with this idea that found footage is still so terrifying- its just not. The initial 'omg i saw blair witch project and i actually think its real, it was so damn scary' phase is over, you cant trick audiences so easily and in my mind thats the only thing that could make found footage truely scary- believability. I recently watched the Fourth Kind and was not impressed since i couldnt believe for a second that any of the footage was real, it felt so set up. apart from that i thought it was a pretty good alien abduction movie, i just wish there had been more ambiguity. |
|
| 12 |
sephiroth7 Posted on Saturday September 11, 2010, 23:04
@albumental The article says this style of movie is scary. Rec and Blair Witch are both enjoyable but scary? Not so much. So in the context of this artical, no it doesn't work. |
|
| 13 |
mileyfan01 Posted on Sunday September 12, 2010, 00:12
The Last Exorcism is NOT found footage.
Quite the opposite in fact. It was always intended as a documentary, edited, scored and shot to be released as a documentary. Which clearly separates it from 'The Blair Witch Project'.
At Frighfest in London the director was asked why this documentary has a score which takes the viewer away from the 'realness' of it. Naturally not the director himself but Eli Roth answered that 'The Last Exorcism' was never going to be found footage. Nowadays almost every documentary film maker uses additional soundtrack to add to the experience.
|
|
| 14 |
three_droogs Posted on Sunday September 12, 2010, 00:21
This will be an unpopular post but the film that has done this the most wrong in my view is Cloverfield. There are two main reasons why I couldn't buy into their approach to the 'found footage' format:
1. I have a camcorder. It does not record 6.1 digital surround sound. This prevents me from buying into the premise just as much as the addition of music. The sound quality is a clear message that I am watching something engineered for cinema, and not an amateur's found recording.
2. The framing. Unlike the greats of this genre (Blair Witch (the best only for being the first) REC and Paranormal Activity where you found yourself searching the screen for the next horror, Cloverfield's every shot is perfectly framed to give you the full picture - then seemingly a button is pressed labelled "add shakiness". The most obvious example of this being when they are balancing across a rooftop of a building collapsed at a 30 degree angle, hundreds of feet above the ground, with the sounds of a murderous giant monster approaching, and we are treated to a perfect cityscape all the way, with our companions in the bottom right corner to keep the perspective. I defy the world's greatest and most experienced cameraman in the world to have held that shot, let alone some shit-scared teenager.
Add to this the plot from Godzilla, predictable scares due to scenes stolen directly from other greater movies (the subway scene - aliens, the monsters last swipe at the chopper - well, pretty much every monster movie since the dawn of monster movies) and having to put up with every review (including Empire's) banging on about how original it all is, and you have for me the most disappointing effort of 2008. Thankfully Paranormal came along later to show that there are still some new ideas to be had with the genre.
Let the abuse commence... |
|
| 15 |
three_droogs Posted on Sunday September 12, 2010, 00:22
This will be an unpopular post but the film that has done this the most wrong in my view is Cloverfield. There are two main reasons why I couldn't buy into their approach to the 'found footage' format:
1. I have a camcorder. It does not record 6.1 digital surround sound. This prevents me from buying into the premise just as much as the addition of music. The sound quality is a clear message that I am watching something engineered for cinema, and not an amateur's found recording.
2. The framing. Unlike the greats of this genre (Blair Witch (the best only for being the first) REC and Paranormal Activity where you found yourself searching the screen for the next horror, Cloverfield's every shot is perfectly framed to give you the full picture - then seemingly a button is pressed labelled "add shakiness". The most obvious example of this being when they are balancing across a rooftop of a building collapsed at a 30 degree angle, hundreds of feet above the ground, with the sounds of a murderous giant monster approaching, and we are treated to a perfect cityscape all the way, with our companions in the bottom right corner to keep the perspective. I defy the world's greatest and most experienced cameraman in the world to have held that shot, let alone some shit-scared teenager.
Add to this the plot from Godzilla, predictable scares due to scenes stolen directly from other greater movies (the subway scene - aliens, the monsters last swipe at the chopper - well, pretty much every monster movie since the dawn of monster movies) and having to put up with every review (including Empire's) banging on about how original it all is, and you have for me the most disappointing effort of 2008. Thankfully Paranormal came along later to show that there are still some new ideas to be had with the genre.
Let the abuse commence ... |
|
| 16 |
Whistler Posted on Sunday September 12, 2010, 23:19
I think sometimes it works really well and sometimes it doesn't. It depends on the director really, but I don't think it should ever die out. It can give a terrifyingly real atmosphere to a film, and Paranormal Activity does this especially well in my opinion. |
|
| 17 |
mighty mick Posted on Tuesday September 14, 2010, 13:49
Paranormal Activity made me terrified to sleep in my basement back home (yes, I sleep in a basement) for a couple of nights. It just goes to show how effective a very basic set-up can be: camera, bedroom, open door, dark corridor, let the dread creep in. It is without doubt the scariest film I've seen in years and one which is all the more scarring if watched in a domestic envrionment.
Cloverfield was impressive for its contemporary subtext (9/11 imagined as unexplained Monster attack) and its almost perfect blend of CGI with actual footage. I do however believe the film should've ended with the helicopter crash, that money shot of the monster completely took me out of the experience.
[REC] I believe is far more impressive as an exercise in acting and perfect timing - the bit in which the little girl suddenly zombs out on the mother will always shock me. And of course, it shows how night-vision can indeed make everything in the dark 25% scarier.
Then again, I also agree that it's unfortunately becoming a tiring trend. I have no desire to watch [REC]3 or Paranormal Activity 2, they only diminish what was so well achieved in the previous outings. |
|
| 18 |
leetee80 Posted on Thursday September 16, 2010, 13:30
In My Huimble Opinion, Paranormal Activity was pants. I like the found footage movies as they usualy give unpredictability and genuine scares. Paranormal Activity showed a very basic and rigid movie format. I had heard from friends its very scary, so I duely turned lights off, volume up, and watched alone to try and freak myself out. By then end it was uneventful and I was glad of some deaths!!
Still there is a future for these movies, but I think the multi million dollar movie companies will take a hold of this genre and exploit it with weak efforts, as they crave for the sequels to rake in more money, but they are gauranteed the money back as they are low budget and high grossing movies, in relation.
The next major wobbly cam presentation... Super 8... could it be the beginning of the end |
|
| 19 |
Discodez Posted on Thursday September 16, 2010, 16:46
Not sure I'd class some of those films as "found footage", is [REC] a found footage film? I'm not so sure. If you are arguing that [REC] is a found footage film then you could also say that Man bites Dog (spoiler alert) is a found footage film, after all the documentary crew all end up dead by the end. You've also missed a real corker of a film from that list in "The Last Broadcast" which many have argued was the direct inspiration for Blair Witch. |
|
| 20 |
John76 Posted on Thursday September 16, 2010, 17:03
I've been expecting to go off 'found footage film' for quite a while now (the same way I got tired of zombie movies) but it's not really happened yet. Yes it's getting a bit cliched but still much less so than your 'normal' horror flick as I think someone further up this forum mentions. There are some stinkers obviously - there always are (Diary of The Dead). I think they are very good tools for new film makers to cheaply make their mark - Blair Witch and Paranormal Activity come to mind and of course Last Broadcast as Discodez says (I'd forgotten about that one). Similarly they are good for bringing to life an older genre - Cloverfield was a brilliant take on the monster attacking the city genre of movie. I think that's how it will last (if it will) by looking at a genre other than horror and approaching it in a different way. I'm writing a script for a found footage nativity movie... |
|
| 21 |
InvisibleDuncan Posted on Friday September 17, 2010, 14:46
For me, the problem with found-footage films is when then the cameraman films the wrong thing. There was one particular scene in Cloverfield where our heroes are cowering behind a car while a huge monster rampages around slightly further down the street. Does he film the monster, like any normal person would do? No, he sits and films his friends blubbering and shrieking instead. |
|
|
 |
EMPIRE BLOGGERS | |
|
|