Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Follow Me on Pinterest
Empire
Trending On Empire
Two free posters with Empire magazine
Subscribe: Get Dead Island: Riptide
Empire's Soundtrack Celebration
90 Years Of Warner Bros.
Vote for your favourite film
Cannes Film Festival 2013
News, photos and more from the Croisette
Empire Blogs
Under The Radar

Back to all blogs Comment Now

Sundance 2010: The Killer Inside Me causes outrage!

Posted on Monday January 25, 2010, 09:54 by Damon Wise in Under The Radar
Sundance 2010: The Killer Inside Me causes outrage!

Oh. My. God. This blog was meant to be about The Runaways, in which Kristen Stewart plays Joan Jett and has a lesbian love scene with Dakota Fanning while crossing gender lines and snorting cocaine in a tragic-sweet biopic celebrating the life and times of the 70s all-girl rock band of the same name. That seemed a story enough... until the lights came up on Michael Winterbottom's The Killer Inside Me, a surprisingly faithful adaptation of Jim Thompson's 1952 pulp novel in which a smalltown Texas cop becomes embroiled in a series of increasingly psychopathic murders. It began with an amazing retro credits sequence and ended with a woman, shaking with rage, asking why this film was chosen for the festival. In between, Winterbottom's latest provocation made Chris Morris's Four Lions seem quite mild in comparison, creating a compelling study of madness that had the audience gasping and the people behind me wondering aloud (in the way that everybody in Sundance wonders aloud) if the film would ever see the light of day in America.

I'll say up front that the film had some technical problems: the sound (or was it the acoustics?) seemed off, and star Casey Affleck's reedy voice frequently got lost in the mix. This made the film somewhat hard to follow, as it starts in a low-key, talky, noir fashion, with Affleck's Lou Ford being sent across town by his boss to send a local prostitute packing. He doesn't; instead, Ford embarks on a brutal S&M affair with her that suddenly turns dark in a way that will immediately raise hackles. I'd rather not go too much into plot, but they then plan a blackmail sting on a local business mogul, threatening to expose his seedy son if a ransom isn't paid. This is is the basic premise, and it sounds fairly standard, like the usual neo-noir stuff: it could be the Wachowski brothers' Bound, maybe, or one of John Dahl's films from when he was actually good.

But what's not very standard, however, is the violence. Though it is initially suggested rather than shown, in scenes that find Ford behaving more than a bit erratically, the cruelty in this film goes way beyond the endurance level of the average viewer. Blue Velvet this is not; there is no artful surrealism, just bleak, bloody and unjustifiable punishment, most of it (but not only) directed against women. And that's not all. Those women seem not just to endure it but to enjoy it, as much as they love the closed-off, sick, and sexually aberrant Ford – who, after all, is the person telling us this. The fact that these women are played by Kate Hudson and Jessica Alba only compounded the horror that seemed to ricochet around the auditorium, while the homely, hillbilly radio tunes on the score, plus Marcel Zyskind's pristine cinematography, put it all in a slick, plausible period setting.

I think I need to see the film again to know for sure how I feel about it, but twice after the lights came up I heard snarky audience members mention the words “American” and “Psycho”, each time in a tone of voice suggesting that this was nothing new. Well, Jim Thompson dealt in first-person wacko narratives well before Bret Easton Ellis, and – duh – in American Psycho, violence was a metaphor for the venal, self-serving economics of the United States in Ronald Reagan's wake. The Killer Inside Me, however, is about real violence, about real insanity, and the mental confusion that turns love upside down and destroys everything in its wake. I'm still not sure that I got it all, but from what I think I saw, I'm prepared to say that I think The Killer Inside Me, like Werner Herzog's My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done, is an incredibly effectively and chilling exploration of mental breakdown, aided by a gripping central performance from Affleck as Ford, the killer on the road whose brain really IS squirming like a toad. Maybe if I see it again it might break the spell, but for now Winterbottom's film has followed me home and won't leave my brain alone. I'm far too old to be saying this, but I think The Killer Inside Me is badass. In all the best, right and wrong ways.

Login or register to comment.

Comments

1 Manfrendshensindshen
Posted on Wednesday January 27, 2010, 16:00
Was the experience so extreme that Mr Wise is now in therapy? I'm asking because Sundance updates are conspicuous by their absence...

2 Damon_Wise
Posted on Wednesday January 27, 2010, 16:18
Just busy, man! I've seen Welcome To The Rileys, Frozen, Smash His Camera, Teenage Parazzo, The Extra Man, Cyrus, Winter's Bone, Twelve... Buried and Exit Through The Gift Shop today; all reports coming as soon I get the time...

3 zoots
Posted on Friday January 29, 2010, 01:06
oooooh! yet another conveniently titillating 'controversial' film that sexualizes violence against women (where's gaspar noe?) and we're SHOCKED. another director pushing that tired old envelope. it's only shocking in the way getting punched in the face is always shocking but under the surface it's about as conformist as it gets. fraudulent film-making.

4 Damon_Wise
Posted on Friday January 29, 2010, 08:25
Did you see it? I'm happy to discuss it with you if you have. I don't agree.

5 Coldpie
Posted on Wednesday February 3, 2010, 09:54
I know that most often movies and their directors find other things to fixate on etc when they are translating books for screen, but having read your review its sounds that the director was very very faithful.
i find the shock that audiences feel to be a good thing as watching violence of this kind should never be easy, but the reaction of many who believe instantly that its overtly sexualising violence against women, i think they are massively missing the point.
the argument has been around for so long -and with good reason- but it has then become a shield that stops many from seeing when the violence on the screen is indicative of the lengths the character's mental sickness goes. its automatically taken that its sick gratification whereas in the book and hopfully the movie its about a very real mental abberation that is able to go about disguised in society dispite the shocking things he does.
i think the book and certainly the movie should be read from this point of view, if you go in thinking- just another american psycho or here we go more sexy violence then you'll miss the chance to watch a fantastic actor, Affleck, immerse himself in the psychology of a psychopath, the lengths he'll go and the things he finds not only normal but exciting and necessary. go in watching the character and ask why is he doing that, dont go in to find cliche's.

6 shalmo
Posted on Wednesday May 26, 2010, 07:38
I would recommend seeing it again as the tension from a largely right wing American audience must have been palpable!
I felt Greengrass' lack of trust in his audience by showing everything undermined a film that was stylistically beautiful. Go back and see a classic noir and the beauty of the genre is the suggestion and what is implied. Showing the level of violence that Greengrass does just displays his voyeuristic nature and lack of skill. I haven't read the book but I know the genre and I felt robbed.
I hope Affleck limits the psycho roles as well. He is a very talented actor with enormous range - fabulous in Gone Baby Gone. Just want to see more of him.
A good film that could have been great had Greengrass trusted us more.

7 vorknyx
Posted on Wednesday May 26, 2010, 10:51
In fairness, the movie is directed by Micheal Winterbottom, not the excellent Paul Greengrass. Will reserve judgement until watching it, but Winterbottoms previous 'controversial' movies were explicit but seemed to have little point to make, and for that matter were not explicit in either an erotic sense or in a way that offered insight into characters. Leaving a bit more to suggestion would have taken nothing away yet made the film(s) a little more accessible (but as pointed out, requires more film making skill).

Log in below, or register to post comments
Username:
Password:
Remember Me:

CATEGORIES

Empire States (412)

Under The Radar (289)

Infinite Lives (75)

Small Screen (53)

Cannes 2011 (28)

Off The Wire (23)

Comic-Con 2010 (21)

Words From The Wise (11)

Casting Couch (2)

Oscars 2011 (1)


RECENT POSTS

Drive Like Dominic Toretto - Sort Of
By Alice Wybrew

Screen To Stage: Once
By Helen O'Hara

Empire's Sneak-Peek Iron Man 3 Footage Reaction
By Chris Hewitt

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
By Ali Plumb

The Ultimate Gin-Joint: Future Cinema Does Casablanca
By Nick de Semlyen

Seth MacFarlane: Oscar Hero Or Lame Duck?
By Phil de Semlyen

Start Your Career - New Opportunity For Young Filmmakers
By Ian Freer

Five Things We Learnt At The London Toy Fair 2013
By Phil de Semlyen

HMV And The Dying Art Of Browsing
By Chris Hewitt

Empire Vs. Spider-Man: Turn Off The Dark
By Ali Plumb


RECENT COMMENTS

Screen To Stage: Once
"Good blog, i will Subscription the blog and also welcome care for my blog ouwen smith's blog."  kilymom
Read comment

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
"In one of my proudest moments, a friend kept referring to his current relationship as "ridiculo"  abiggerboat84
Read comment

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
"...And LOTR obviously: "Give them a moment, for pity's sake!" (whilst affecting bad Northe"  Cookiedough
Read comment

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
"Ooh - good one! Here goes: "Great Scott!", "Bo! There's a bomb on the bus!", &qu"  Cookiedough
Read comment

Screen To Stage: Once
"It's funny, I was a bit wary about going to see it because I really love the film, and I really want"  jencat
Read comment

Screen To Stage: Once
"Saw this a few months ago in Dublin, right around the corner from the place they shot the opening bu"  nmc1007
Read comment

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
"Only two i can think of, my wife and I tend to go WHAAAAA? like Moe the bartender in simpsons, and o"  jedi_theforce
Read comment

What's Your Favourite Harry Potter Plot Hole?
"I have read all the books, so it's probably the lack of explanation in the films that is causing a l"  Animatorpete
Read comment

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
"I end up saying 'Honestly, who throws a shoe?!' from Austin Powers an awful lot for anything bizarre"  jencat
Read comment

What Are Your Cinematic Affectations?
"For years now (to amuse myself but not family) I like to utter Darth Vader's lines   KURGAN007
Read comment


POPULAR POSTS

Movies’ Most Quotable Lines
565 comments

'It's Just A Bit Of Fun': Why Defensive Fans Are Bad News For Movies
361 comments

Competitive Geek Baiting: Or, How To Start A Fanboy Fight
338 comments

What's The Worst Movie Dialogue Of All Time?
336 comments

The Best Movie Swearing
317 comments

The Avatar Backlash: Evaluatin' The Hater-atin'
303 comments

The Complete List Of Tired Movie Cliches
285 comments

What's The Greatest Ever Movie Title?
272 comments

Are These The Most Quotable Movies Ever?
263 comments

When Bad Films Turn Good
261 comments


BLOGGERS
Damon Wise (273)
Helen O'Hara (156)
James Dyer (85)
Chris Hewitt (83)
Amar Vijay (71)
Ali Plumb (50)
David Scarborough (38)
Sam Toy (34)
Sam Toy (31)
Stephen Carty (31)
James White (27)
Simon Braund (24)
Olly Richards (23)
Ian Freer (21)
Nick de Semlyen (20)
Phil de Semlyen (18)
Nev Pierce (10)
Glen Ferris (8)
Dan Jolin (8)
Nick de Semlyen (8)
Owen Williams (8)
Peter Lord (6)
Emily Phillips (6)
Kat Brown (3)
Dan Goodswen (3)
Kim Newman (3)
Jodie McEwan (3)
Empire Empire (2)
Sebastian Williamson (2)
Eve Barlow (2)
Emma Cochrane (2)
Edmund Ward (1)
Chris Smith (1)
Alice Wybrew (1)
Jonny Pile (1)
Steve Charnock (1)
Empire Workie (1)
Colin Kennedy (1)
Tom Ambrose (1)
Lucy Quick (1)
Benjamin Lee (1)
David Parkinson (1)
Dallas King (1)
Ross Bennett (1)
John Hitchcox (1)
Siam Goorwich (1)
Sanam Jehanfard (1)
Anton Bitel (1)


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
Movie Poster Mashups: The Furniture Edition
You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll be appalled at the punning...

Cannes Film Festival Videblogisodes #1
Leonardo Di Caprio, Baz Luhrmann and a mysterious stranger kick things off

Exclusive: Why Man Of Steel Wasn't Called Superman
Writer and producer David S. Goyer speaks

Dwayne Johnson Talks Fast & Furious 6
'I wanted to come in and frankly dominate the movie.'

Music Celebration: David Holmes On The Making Of The Out Of Sight Soundtrack
'I watched the film... the music was all over the shop'

The Rise And Fall Of The Movie Power Ballad
What happened to those endless movie theme no.1 hits?

Hans Zimmer Career Interview
On The Dark Knight, Man Of Steel and Going For Gold

Subscribe For Only £20
Get Dead Island: Riptide and six issues of Empire for only £20! Subscribe now
Steven Spielberg iPad App
Hollywood's most beloved director in this unique iPad special. Download now
Empire iPad Edition
The world's biggest movie magazine available on iPad Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media  |  Terms And Conditions  |  Our Data Promise To You  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media. Company number 1176085 (England). Registered Office: 21 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2DY