 |
 |
 |
The Stath Who Would Be King
 Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 15:08 by Glen Ferris in Empire States
 There was a time, not so long ago, when heroes walked the Earth. Fighting for truth, justice and the right to bear pumped-up arms, they were a race of godlike beings whose preferred brand of quip-quip-bang-bang lawgiving marked them out as heroes of cinema. But the likes of Schwarzenegger, Stallone and Willis (hell, even Van Damme and Seagal) are all gone, consigned to straight-to-DVD hell or branching out into elder statesmen roles or governmental positions. Still, we weren't worried. There were many possible replacements to fill their bulging wifebeaters, so we'd be fine. Except that somewhere along the way all those up-and-coming action stars fell by the wayside, until only one muscleman remains – and he's British? That’s right; the ultimate action star of our times is Jason Statham, a bald Cockney who made his name playing diamond geezers and cheeky rogues. That’s not to say The Stath has had a smooth ride but, for one reason or another, his contemporaries have fallen on their own swords. A few years ago, the next generation of action stars seemed to be set in stone, but odd career choices have paved the way for the London dynamo’s ascent to ass-kicking royalty. Vin Diesel, for example, had extreme action-loving, petrol-headed film freaks in the palm of his hands with The Fast and the Furious and xXx, but then he threw it all away to make Disney’s The Pacifier. Then there’s The Rock. In Welcome To The Jungle, Arnold Schwarzenegger (in one of his last screen roles) symbolically handed over his crown with a casual admonition to "Have fun", and for a time the former WWE superstar looked as though he’d wear it with pride. But then he reverted back to Dwayne Johnson, signed up to a bunch of kiddie flicks and high-concept oddities (Southland Tales, we're looking at you) and pissed away all that goodwill. Other pretenders - including the likes of Gerard Butler (too many rom-coms), Stephen Chow (too comedic), Jet Li (too many arty wushu flicks), Jackie Chan (once great, now a little sad) and Matt Damon (predominantly a serious actor with a successful action sideline) – have come close, but for balls-out, brainless, brilliant butt-bashing in cinema right now, no one comes close to challenging The Stath. Simply put, he’s the only star working today who trades solely and successfully in multiplex-pleasing action fare without getting ideas above his station. Let’s review the facts: From 2001’s Ghosts Of Mars until this year’s Death Race, he has appeared in 17 movies. 12 of those are unequivocally action fare, two cameos find him either handing over a gun or getting killed by one (Collateral and The Pink Panther respectively), two dramas (Revolver and London) still have him cracking a few skulls and one (The Bank Job) sees him playing a robber who gives the human brick shithouse that is Craig Fairbrass a thorough kicking. The truth is unavoidable. No matter what he does, Jason Statham is hard as nails and no one else comes close to equalling him. We’re sure he’d be up to the challenge if someone tried though.
Login or register to comment.
Comments
| 1 |
Manfrendshensindshen Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 15:57
Yes, you're right, but what The Stath still lacks is a stab at greatness: his Terminator (or Die Hard) or something of similar quality. Of course it's hard to argue about quality when it comes to popcorn cinema, but c'mon, he starred in an Uwe Boll film! In order to be considered a truly great action star, he should improve on his crappy screenplay detection skills - hopefully he doesn't have to mortgage his home, so he could now be less concerned about paychecks than he used to be, enabling him to care a bit more about quality control. Now, Jase, go and get yourself a really good actioner script - I'd happily welcome a British action character for the ages! |
|
| 2 |
hypnotoad Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 16:09
Dont you think that Crank holds up to Terminator or Die Hard? I remember seeing that film for the first time thinking that it would be action twaddle but was blown away by the nuttiness of it! Still, being in an Uwe Boll film probably takes away some of the kudos.....and yes, I am human! |
|
| 3 |
tomcat Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 16:14
And yet he's still an awful actor. I suppose, given the acting pedigree of those that have gone before him (Stallone, Schwarzenegger), that's not really the point. Can't we have someone who's as hard as nails AND convincing when they open their mouths? |
|
| 4 |
Ethanial Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 16:16
Well, Dwayne Johnson should never be considered just an action star, I think he has the necessary qualities to do well, he didn't need much to be brilliant in Southland Tales, but it's nice that Statham is so unashamedly action man of the 21st century. Why wouldn't you see him beat the living shit out of people, or shoot them and throw their hands on their corpses, and then still be good and human humoured in the situations. Death Race should be a terrible film, it is essentially, but with all the right moves it's a big dumb actioner, and Statham's charisma really helps, and the Transporters and Crank, god, sequels should never be made on these kinds of films, but you can't help but enjoy him killing and injuring people for hours on end can you? |
|
| 5 |
darthtris Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 16:49
I've always had respect for the Stath. It's interesting to see his growth in terms of actual skills as well. He could only do a few punches in The One, but in Transporter he was doing spinning back kicks with aplomb. Go Stath I say. His recent interview in the london paper was refreshingly modest as well. No pretensions at all. Let's hope that Crank 2 can be as good as the first one... |
|
| 6 |
the ageless stranger Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 16:50
Has the whole world gone INSANE?!?!?
Jason Statham, action star of the new millenium? For the love of mutton, all the man does is growl and neglect to shave.
The major point here is that while none of the past "greats" of action cinema were exactly brimming over with Oscar potential, they had one thing which "The Stath" sorely lacks; Charisma. The man is a void. Even Ah-Nuld (while playing a robot, for Christ's sake!) could drop a cool line every once in a while, and let's see Statham cock a shotgun one-handed.
As for modern day action stars, I'll take the Rock going mental in Southland Tales over another Transporter mess any day. |
|
| 7 |
ordboy17 Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 17:35
I agree that Statham needs to step up and do a truely great actioner such as Predator or The Terminator. Crank and the Transporters are entertaining enough but fall a long way short of being classics. The only other actor that maybe comes close to Statham's action hero status is Nic Cage. I thought he might step up and take the mantle after doing The Rock, Con Air and Face Off but after seeing Next on sky the other day and then unfortunately paying to see Bankok Dabgerous I've had to drastically re-evaluate that opinion. Plus the fact he seems to be sporting a hair-cut akin to that worn by Sven Goran Erikson. If your losing it Cage, just get rid of it like the Stath.... |
|
| 8 |
beebs_ Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 17:50
I love the Stath. I'm glad he's doing well for himself.
Bring on Crank 2! |
|
| 9 |
Timon Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 18:06
Indeed, The Stath is the last bastion of "over the top, brawn over brains" actioners around.
I'm trying to think who else there is besides the ones already mentioned and all I keep coming up with is Vin... but he crashed his career a while back.
How about Ray Stevenson? Sure it's early days at the moment, but he's had King Arthur (not great but he causes pain), Outpost and he's the new Punisher. Plus Titus Pullo is the hardest bastard ever to wear a skirt (see Rome). |
|
| 10 |
Peterzinho Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 18:56
100% agree with the blog, nobody comes close. Crank was nuttier than a squirrel turd, and he was playing a man called Chev Chelios who ended up tearing through the streets wearing a hospital gown and bearing a chubby - even my mrs enjoyed it, and she wants to watch The Women. Transporter 3 and Crank 2 will seal his world domination. Someone give the man a knighthood. |
|
| 11 |
zoidberg1974 Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 19:57
I can't wait for Transporter 3. It's The Stath vs. T-Bag from Prison Break! |
|
| 12 |
darth silas Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 22:02
For fucks sake Empire! Get your heads out of Stahams arse! The guy cant act and has zero screen presence.Yet you keep going on and on about him in every issue.Does ''The Stath'' have shares in Empire or something? |
|
| 13 |
Experiment 627 Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 23:05
I thought I was the only one who thought Empire was mental for loving the Stath and his miserable action output, but I'm glad to see their are at least two others - the ageless stranger and darth silas, thanks for restoring some of my faith in my own opinions. He's Bacon, and he always will be.
The man is a talent black hole - in my book he's a -27%er. Not only are both Transporters and Crank dog shite, but The Italian Job? What the fuck? The man should be slapped for doing that. He is, however, quite hard, so I'll let someone else do the slapping.
In all honesty though, the blog does have a point about the distinct lack of an action hero with a bit of charisma, but there's just no way Statham could fill this void based on his action output so far. Guess I'll just have to keep watching my DVDs of Die Hard and T2. |
|
| 14 |
O_Goncho Posted on Wednesday October 8, 2008, 23:49
Without doubt if The Stath's name is attatched to an action film nowadays (which isn't sharing spare with 'Uwe Boll', that is) then that's all I need to get excited about it.
But I do wish the Rock would man up and get back to his balls-out action roots instead of all this nonsense lately where it seems he's become the Disney poster boy for wholesome family-friendly fun. My faith in him rests on Witch Mountain it seems, of all things. |
|
| 15 |
joe14c Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 00:50
I watched Death Race just the other day and as much as I didn't think I would or particularly want to...I really liked it.
There's something about The Stathamator, he can't act and his films are generally terrible but you can't help but love him. He's a genuine brickshithouse god bless him, long live The Stath! |
|
| 16 |
any_random_hero Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 02:20
I agree with the points made, but Statham is a bit shit really! I admit I did enjoy crank a fair bit but thats it and no way in hell should there be a sequel. However what about TONY JAA!! He may not be as big a star and his films story lines are always a joke (not exactly the staple of the action genre though is it?) but he gives old school Jackie Chan a run for his money with his moves. I'm sorry but i've never really believed Jason Statham could beat the shit out of the people he fights on screen. Tony Jaa would kill Statham with one swift elbow to the skull. |
|
| 17 |
Bates Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 03:04
You cant deny that the Stath has kicked ass in all of his action films. They are fun to watch and adrenaline fuelled. my only fear is that his films may fall more into the stevensegal catagory as opposed to the bruce willis fare where he truely belongs. |
|
| 18 |
Decent_Jam Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 09:35
The problem is that no one takes action heroes seriously. In the past it was OK, you could watch something like Rambo: First Blood and think "This is just rediculous! But it's still fun!".
Now though, there's a constant push for realism, which is why audiences almost double take when they see effects in films like Death Race or Die Hard 4.0. It seems filmmakers can get away with it in the ever-popular comic book films, but those set in our reality? Nope, no chance.
As great as The Stath is at being...The Stath, unfortunately he isn't going to change any of that. As soon as you see another film with him in, you immediately take it less seriously. Films like Transporter are, of course, supposed to be over the top, in the same way Wanted was, but in terms of serious action actors, it seems their time has passed. |
|
| 19 |
jimoakley666 Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 09:46
Stath is ace! His Frank Martin character from the Transporter films is a class act and even made a cameo appearance in the bloody brilliant Collateral. Michael Mann reacons it IS Frank Martin. |
|
| 20 |
superchocolatebear Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 09:58
Let's face it, the only person in the world that comes close the raw power of The Stath at the moment, is Usain Bolt. However, Bolt's awesomeness is restricted to the running on a track... and lest we forget....The Stath can kill a man with a bycycle. Case closed. |
|
| 21 |
sowasred2012 Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 10:08
This notion that no-one takes action heroes seriously, or that there are no serious action heroes is ridiculous. Matt Damon and Daniel Craig as Bourne/Bond alone prove otherwise. The problem is the term 'action hero' is most readily associated with dumbass action films that Arnie, Sly and Bruce are famous for, so those serious action films, with the serious heroes, get overlooked.
I love The Stath (saw Transporter 2 the other day, manages to rip-off one of my favourite films, Man On Fire, yet be exactly ridiculous enough for me to live it for what it is - dumb, overly macho, balls to the wall fun), but, as other people have been pointing out, he's yet to make his Terminator, Rambo or Die Hard (Crank was brilliant, but Chev Chelios isn't exactly ingrained into public consciousness) so, until he does, he's always gonna be a hairs breadth from becoming the next Steven Seagal or JCVD if he's not careful. |
|
| 22 |
deadbydawn Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 10:20
I agree that the Stath's films are shite and his acting is of the same ilk as keira knightly, but he knows this and doesn't try to be anything other than what he is. The Transporter and Crank while both utterly ridiculous are still hugely enjoyable. While similar films like Shoot em up,just simply sucked balls. So there is something different that he's doing right.
As for the next generation I think both Ryan Reynolds and Nathan Fillion have the charisma, acting ability and looks to fill the void. |
|
| 23 |
sowasred2012 Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 10:36
Speaking of Nathan Fillion, check this video out - the funniest 2 minute porno you'll ever see (assuming you're not easily offended): www.spike.com/video/pg-porn-pg-porn/3041858 |
|
| 24 |
SkullKassidy Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 12:06
Hell yeah! Long live the Stath! |
|
| 25 |
Lupin 3 Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 14:03
Dear Glen,
If you consider Jackie Chan a pretender, especially to Van Damme, Seagal, The Stath (love him), The Rock and Vin Diesel I would suggest you have a lot (and I mean a lot) of films to watch. Like the Police Story trilogy, Armour of God 1+2, Drunken Master 1+2, Snake in the Eagles Shadow, Dragon Lord and Hand of Death to name a few. If you have actually SEEN these films and still consider wor Jackie a pretender, then how the hell did you get a job writing for a film magazine? Yes Jackie is getting old now and this is reflected in the quality of his films (and yes... Woolworth ads) but taking into account the list above I don't see how it could be humanly possible for him to do any more for the action industry. Christian Bale, The Stath, The Rock, Van Damme are all pretenders (as in they are pretending to be the characters they are playing). Jackie Chan is most certainly NOT a pretender, he's pretty much an action God.
You really should know better. |
|
| 26 |
raclements Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 14:20
What you said, Lupin!
To dismiss Chan (arguably the biggest movie star in the world) in such a fashion is not only ridiculous- it's fucking insulting. |
|
| 27 |
Glen Ferris Posted on Thursday October 9, 2008, 17:30
Re: Lupin 3's post: I think you've got me wrong. My blog is all about how at this exact moment in time, Jason Statham is the only real action hero. I was in no way slagging off Jackie Chan for his previous efforts, I am actually a massive fan of his work but since he decided to make the move to Hollywood his quality control has gone ga-ga. Just like Schwazenegger, Stallone and Willis (perhaps even more so), he is indeed an action god but his recent output has been extradordinarily underwhelming. I was not attacking his greatest hits but rather his recent efforts and that's why I believe The Stath has stolen his crown. Believe me when I say that I pray for a return to form for Chan The Man, I just find that with every Rush Hour sequel the chances are increasingly unlikely.
Glen Ferris |
|
| 28 |
joe14c Posted on Friday October 10, 2008, 03:27
I couldn't agree more with your last comment Glen. At this moment in time there's really no one else doing what he does. I was chatting to some friends about this and we couldn't think of anyone else who fit the action staple anymore.
If there is one advantage to this sorry state of affairs, and I can think of only one, is that Freidbeg and Seltzer won't be pumping out 'Action Movie' any time soon. |
|
| 29 |
Lupin 3 Posted on Friday October 10, 2008, 07:46
You'll get no arguement from me about Mr Chan's recent output Glen, but at the age he's at I think you could be a little optimistic about his return to form. I could actually watch Jackie in anything (anything!) but I think that if anybody deserve's a chance to kick back and enjoy his success and let the money roll in, it's him. It's ironic that he broke himself for many years without really enjoying the world wide recognition and general success he craved (and deserved) but once he started doing Ratner buddy movies he lost his edge and became a household name. It pesters me that sooo many people know who he is, yet haven't seen a majority of his true masterpieces. and the Stath does rock, dying for Transporter 3. |
|
| 30 |
rob33cinema Posted on Friday October 10, 2008, 14:46
HE SHAGGED KELLY BROOK FOR CHRISTSAKES - The mans a HERO in my book !!!!!!! |
|
| 31 |
durelius Posted on Friday October 10, 2008, 18:55
The Stath is the man, love his films not sure how people can say he has no charisma or screen presence, he is the very reason you watch the films he's in in the first place and he's is what makes it entertaining. He makes films that are entertaining and when I go to watch a movie I want to be taken away from the daily grind and issues of life and be entertained. The Stath delivers! His films are successful and he seems to have his head screwed on and doesn't take himself too seriously. Looking forward to Transporter 3 and an even more insane Crank 2. |
|
| 32 |
martindean1981 Posted on Sunday October 12, 2008, 10:24
What's your favourite Stath moment? I love the Stath, his movies are very entertaining, but I'm gonna have to put the Kit Kat advert up there as an all time great moment. |
|
| 33 |
A.Sole Posted on Wednesday October 15, 2008, 18:21
So are we saying Stath's the best action star because he's the only one just doing action film at the mo. Do you not think that's because he can't do much else? I think Crank stands as a great film. The rest are just fair to middling b movies. I think the movie industry has changed since the eighties and the great actors can play a number of different roles. Damon and Bale play better action heroes than the stath. Surely what you want from an action hero is actor who plays action heroes way better than anyone else. Daniel Craig for fuck sake, the man kicks ass. The only difference between these actors and Stath is they can diversify well. If you ask yourself whose done the best action films of late, it's not the Stath. Nowhere near. |
|
| 34 |
The Summoned Muse Posted on Wednesday October 15, 2008, 20:03
Just to throw a new name into the mix, what about Liam Neeson? He was pretty nimble with a sword in Kingdom of Heaven and Rob Roy, but watch Taken and be in awe of the man. OK, he might not be up to all the back flips and spins that seem de rigeur these days, but he is clearly not a man to cross, trading punches and kicks with the best of them. Plus, he is an Oscar-nominated actor and he has charisma in spades. So there... |
|
|
 |
RECENT COMMENTS |  | Screen To Stage: Once "Good blog, i will Subscription the blog and also welcome care for my blog ouwen smith's blog." kilymom Read comment What Are Your Cinematic Affectations? "In one of my proudest moments, a friend kept referring to his current relationship as "ridiculo" abiggerboat84 Read comment What Are Your Cinematic Affectations? "...And LOTR obviously: "Give them a moment, for pity's sake!" (whilst affecting bad Northe" Cookiedough Read comment What Are Your Cinematic Affectations? "Ooh - good one! Here goes: "Great Scott!", "Bo! There's a bomb on the bus!", &qu" Cookiedough Read comment Screen To Stage: Once "It's funny, I was a bit wary about going to see it because I really love the film, and I really want" jencat Read comment Screen To Stage: Once "Saw this a few months ago in Dublin, right around the corner from the place they shot the opening bu" nmc1007 Read comment What Are Your Cinematic Affectations? "Only two i can think of, my wife and I tend to go WHAAAAA? like Moe the bartender in simpsons, and o" jedi_theforce Read comment What's Your Favourite Harry Potter Plot Hole? "I have read all the books, so it's probably the lack of explanation in the films that is causing a l" Animatorpete Read comment What Are Your Cinematic Affectations? "I end up saying 'Honestly, who throws a shoe?!' from Austin Powers an awful lot for anything bizarre" jencat Read comment What Are Your Cinematic Affectations? "For years now (to amuse myself but not family) I like to utter Darth Vader's lines KURGAN007 Read comment |
|
|
|
|
|
 |