Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
The Big 2015 Movie Preview
The 50 Best Films Of 2014
Review Of The Year 2014
Subscribe To Empire!
Get 12 issues from just £25
Must-Have Movie Collectibles
Bid on some classic memorabilia
Movie News

LATEST HEADLINES
TODAY
Rose Byrne Back For X-Men: Apocalypse
Moira MacTaggert will return
Peter Berg In Talks To Take Over Deepwater Horizon
J.C. Chandor has left the film
Jamie Foxx Planning A Sleepless Night
Michelle Monaghan is also set for the remake
Game Of Thrones Launches Season 5 Trailer
They could be heroes (and villains)
Elijah Wood Joins The Trust
He'll co-star with Nicolas Cage
James Franco Directing In Dubious Battle
Bryan Cranston, Vincent D’Onofrio and Robert Duvall all set to star
Geraldine McEwan 1932-2015
The versatile actress has died aged 82
American Sniper Tops US Box Office Again
Project Almanac appears third
More Movie News

RELATED NEWS
19 January 2015
Ridley Scott Producing New Civil War Drama
Set among the conflict's nurses
More Movie News

RELATED FUTURE FILMS
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
18 December 2015
More Future Films

RELATED REVIEWS
Exodus: Gods And Kings (2014)
Empire Star Rating
The Expendables 3 (2014)
Empire Star Rating
Paranoia (2014)
Empire Star Rating
The Counsellor (2013)
Empire Star Rating
Ender's Game (2013)
Empire Star Rating
More new cinemas releases
DVD & Blu-ray releases

Ridley Scott Talks New Blade Runner Pic
'It's liable to be a sequel'

06 November 2011  |  Written by James White  |  Source: Wall St Journal

submit to reddit

Ridley Scott Talks New Blade Runner Pic

Back in August, we brought word of the surprise announcement that Ridley Scott would actually be the man to develop and direct Alcon Entertainment’s new take on the Blade Runner universe. Few details were available then, but now Scott has talked to the Wall Street Journal about the film, admitting what most of us have already figured, that it’s “liable to be a sequel.”

Though everything remains mostly up in the air, from the tone of Scott’s comments, he’s actually further along with the project than you might realise. “I think I’m close to finding a writer that might be able to help me deliver,” Scott says. “We’re quite a long way in, actually.”

We’ll still have to wait and see what the final shape of the film is, though according to the director, you shouldn’t expect to see any of the old faces back on screen – when asked if Harrison Ford’s Deckard might return, he simply replied, “No, not really.”

He was also forthcoming about why he thinks audiences had issues with the original, something he ascribes to different expectations. “Even though people think it’s a cool Philip Marlowe film with Deckard played by Harrison Ford, the film is very much about humanity.”

Bet he realises there are considerable expectations for the new film, too…


Have Your Say
To comment on this, and all articles, register for free or login now.

Jessica Chastain Will Be Princess Diana
For Caught In Flight
Todd Field Accepts The Creed Of Violence
Update: He's got the funds to make it

Your Comments

RE: yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
I have no problem with a Spidey reboot after 3. It sucked so bad through being overcrowded with storylines and the decision to undermine the reason Parker became Spider-Man by rewriting the origin history re the death of Uncle Ben, that it really had nowhere to go but back to the start. The 3D is a bigger minus for me, but since I'll be seeing it in 2D, 3D is irrelevant to me. I wont be seeing Prometheus in 3D either Ridley, bring it on! In 2D. More

Posted by jobloffski at 09:31 on 14 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
I know that movie execs just hitch their star to an existing name for a cheap win. I appreciate that this has been happening for years and I know this won't change but whatever your view you have to agree that it's been getting increasingly ridiculous over the last few years. Hollywood seems more soulless then ever before. The worst offender in recent history in my opinion being the reboot of the Spider man series so soon after the last lot. I read the Sony execs reasoning behind doing it in Em More

Posted by jodybriggs at 22:56 on 13 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
Hollywood, from day one has looked backwards for ideas, to create the highest potential to maximise earnings, because to go with what is already known is less of a financial risk. Adapting novels and plays, remaking silent films into talkies, spurious remakes in order to retain the rights to a 'property', etc it's d. The amount of money made on the big hits makes it possible for risks to be taken on new ideas, which are always an unknown quantity in the minds of the people who have to sup More

Posted by jobloffski at 13:27 on 10 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
L: jodybriggs I don't know about everyone else, but I don't think Blade runner left anything to be said in a sequel. Sure It was an ambiguous ending, Deckard didn't change the world or anything stupid like that, but it wasn't opened ended either. What seems to be happening with this type of thing is the sequel comes out on the back of a classic, ends up being crap, and then recedes into nothing more then a footnote in the history of the original, and god knows Blade Runner has a pretty More

Posted by silent_tea at 12:26 on 10 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: Sequel idea
Warner Brothers involvement in a sequel bodes very well. Look at what they've allowed Nolan to do in Batman films. Dark isn't the box office poison it was 30 years ago, and if anything, tortured heroes are 'money' right now. Even kids who grew up reading (much more than watching) Harry Potter have their 'hero increasingly put through the wringer, beaten, battered, bruised and mentally tortured for his whole life, wracked with self doubt and desperately wanting to be anyone but himself, to have More

Posted by jobloffski at 00:36 on 09 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: Sequel idea
What's the worst that can happen? A shit movie? Big whup. If it turns out to be awesome, that'll be...well...awesome. There's really nothing to lose. More

Posted by max314 at 23:38 on 08 November 2011 | Report This Post

Sequel idea
I thought a cool idea for a sequel would be that Rachel has the ability to give birth (she was the newest replicant with all the latest updates), and she produces a son, the big problem being he has no soul, and it turns out he's rather an unpleasant chap, a Bladerunner posse is formed to hunt him down before he destroys the human race! You can have that for free Mr Scott. More

Posted by swhib at 13:19 on 08 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
L: jodybriggs I don't know about everyone else, but I don't think Blade runner left anything to be said in a sequel. Sure It was an ambiguous ending, Deckard didn't change the world or anything stupid like that, but it wasn't opened ended either. What seems to be happening with this type of thing is the sequel comes out on the back of a classic, ends up being crap, and then recedes into nothing more then a footnote in the history of the original, and god knows Blade Runner has a pretty More

Posted by NCC1701A at 09:55 on 08 November 2011 | Report This Post

Yawn...
Ridley seriously needs to retire or just stick to producing if he's just gonna keep rehashing his old stuff...leave those alone and give us something fresh... More

Posted by ronniem at 09:23 on 08 November 2011 | Report This Post

RE: yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
L: jodybriggs Next summer, gone with the wind 2: Rhett's revenge! one With The Wind already has a sequel.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarlett_%28novel%29 More

Posted by emogeek at 20:58 on 07 November 2011 | Report This Post

yet another throw away sequel on the back of a classic name.
I don't know about everyone else, but I don't think Blade runner left anything to be said in a sequel. Sure It was an ambiguous ending, Deckard didn't change the world or anything stupid like that, but it wasn't opened ended either. What seems to be happening with this type of thing is the sequel comes out on the back of a classic, ends up being crap, and then recedes into nothing more then a footnote in the history of the original, and god knows Blade Runner has a pretty full history as it is. More

Posted by jodybriggs at 17:40 on 07 November 2011 | Report This Post


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
Joaquin Phoenix Talks Inherent Vice
Plus co-stars Josh Brolin and Katherine Waterston

Stephen Daldry Talks Trash
The Billy Elliot man on his Rio carnival and training as a clown

Colin Firth And Taron Egerton Talk Kingsman: The Secret Service
Plus Samuel L. Jackson on bad-guy duties

A Brief History Of The Ring
Everything you need to know about the J-horror reboot

The X-Men TV Series: 10 Possible Plotlines
Mutants on a budget? We suggest some ideas for Fox’s new franchise extension

10 Kid-Friendly Marvel Comics That Could Be The Next Big Hero 6
Walt Disney Animation Studios have a lot to play with elsewhere in the Marvelverse

20 Sitcom Spin-Offs That Were Doomed To Fail
From Joey to Ally and back again…

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get 12 Issues Of Empire For Only £25!

Get exclusive subscriber-only covers each month!

Subscribe today

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save maney on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Get 12 issues of Empire for just £25!
Get exclusive subscriber-only covers each month Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)