Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Search   
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr
Empire
Trending On Empire
Empire's New Tom Cruise Cover
The Jameson Empire Awards 2014
Vote: The Greatest 301 Movies Of All Time!
Rebecca Hall:
My Movie Life

The actress picks the movies that shaped her
Mountain Dew Green Screen
Register now to see X-Men: First Class!
Movie News

LATEST HEADLINES
TODAY
Lupita Nyong'o & Scarlett Johansson In Talks For The Jungle Book
Jon Favreau rounds up friends old and new
New Trailer For Sin City: A Dame To Kill For
Power is a fragile thing...
More Movie News

RELATED NEWS
14 April 2014
Harrison Ford Talks Blade Runner Sequel
'I'm quite curious and excited'
More Movie News

RELATED REVIEWS
The Counsellor (2013)
Empire Star Rating
Prometheus (2012)
Empire Star Rating
Robin Hood (2010)
Empire Star Rating
Body of Lies (2008)
Empire Star Rating
Blade Runner: The Final Cut (2007)
Empire Star Rating
More new cinemas releases
DVD & Blu-ray releases

Warners Wants Blade Runner Sequels
And prequels. And spin-offs...

03 March 2011  |  Written by James White  |  Source: Deadline

submit to reddit

In the blitz of remakes, reboots, prequels and sequels, a few films have stood sacred, with many of us convinced that Hollywood simply would. Not. Go. There. Well, it appears that one of those barriers has been well and smashed with Blind Side production company Alcon sending out a press release about buying up the rights to Blade Runner, announcing its intention to start work on prequels, sequels, spin-offs and a TV cartoon called Blade Runner Babies.

Okay, maybe not the last one, but Broderick Johnson and Andrew Kosgrove, who run the Warner Bros.-based company, are busy negotiating with producer Bud Yorkin, the man who holds the key to Rick Deckard and co.

“We are honoured and excited to be in business with Bud Yorkin,” they said in the statement picked up by Deadline. “This is a major acquisition for our company, and a personal favourite film for both of us. We recognize the responsibility we have to do justice to the memory of the original with any prequel or sequel we produce. We have long-term goals for the franchise, and are exploring multi-platform concepts, not just limiting ourselves to one medium only.”

Yes, lots of use of the “favourite film” language meant to stave off the rush of negative emotion coursing through most fans' bodies right now. Of course, they’ve produced nothing so far, and it’s too early to judge, so maybe they’ll come up with something that honours and respects Ridley Scott’s 1982 classic while opening the world up to a whole new audience and… Nope, not going to go that far just yet either. There’s one bright spark in all of this – the rights don’t include the option to remake the original film, so we’ll be spared that ‘net flame war at least.

For now.


Have Your Say
To comment on this, and all articles, register for free or login now.

Michael Bay On Shooting In 3D
Discover… the AWESOME dimension
Todd Field Accepts The Creed Of Violence
Update: He's got the funds to make it

Your Comments

http://www.clothingsell.org
Hello. My friends, welcome to visit our website.you can try. will make you satisfied.Thank you! == http://www.clothingsell.org == More

Posted by llppjk at 15:51 on 09 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: DisAster
L: Tech_Noir I think people think far too much of these two filmmakers (based off of one sci-fi they each made - neither of whcih were life changing). n the other hand, both of them were very focused on what is, and what is not, good about humanity, both had protagonists going through an 'internal process' by which they wondered about who and what they were, in relation to the job the were doing. NB made a film with a main character conditioned to see those he was evicting as lesser bei More

Posted by jobloffski at 23:31 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: DisAster
anyone remember Paul WS Anderson's SOLDIER? A 'Side-quel' to Blade Runner? Leave this fuckin' movie alone. ote]right] left]This is true. But as long it's not a sequel or prequel. It should be ok.right] right]  More

Posted by Mr Terrific at 21:24 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: DisAster
I think people think far too much of these two filmmakers (based off of one sci-fi they each made - neither of whcih were life changing). More

Posted by Tech_Noir at 21:24 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: DisAster
L: Tech_Noir L: pete_traynor If you must, you probably shouldn't… but if you must: l Blomkamparl Rinsch an Jonesould be a rather tantalising prospect in the hands of any of these directors. ave these two become the default elite sci-fi filmmakers these days? es. And also - if you want to see what a sequel to BR would look like - check out the tv series Total Recall 2070. It pretty much IS  a BR sequel. More

Posted by Rgirvan44 at 21:19 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: DisAster
L: pete_traynor If you must, you probably shouldn’t… but if you must: l Blomkamparl Rinsch an Jonesould be a rather tantalising prospect in the hands of any of these directors. ave these two become the default elite sci-fi filmmakers these days? More

Posted by Tech_Noir at 21:14 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE
]Am I the only person who is happy about this? As much as I love unnerer the series of books to the film.  This means I've already known there are sequels to unnerjust haven't been filmed.  To those saying "don't have Deckard in it!" given that Deckard is featured in the second book, I would be more concerned if they got someone to write a new story that didn't feature any of the characters from the sequel.  Just like with unnerey use the source material well, they could get More

Posted by mr_chainsaw at 21:10 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: DisAster
If you must, you probably shouldn’t… but if you must: 1) Neill Blomkamp 2) Carl Rinsch 3) Duncan Jones Could be a rather tantalising prospect in the hands of any of these directors. While I like Blade Runner a lot I don’t i] hold it in untouchable masterpiece esteem. For my money Alien is Scott’s true masterpiece… and look what happened when they made a sequel to that! It’s a long shot for sure but in the right hands this could just work… More

Posted by pete_traynor at 14:51 on 04 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: Meh
have the star wars and terminator prequels taught us nothing?.......never go back! yes youll make a wad of cash but the FANS will truely hate you for it!.......just proves that the movies are no longer about story telling and are 100% about profilt!..........I could name a dozen books screaming out to be made into movies which would tell a story and make profit! More

Posted by remake_hater at 15:30 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: Oh no
Not really in favour of them expanding the franchise seeing as how it is extremely unlikely they will do the original justice, but there is precedent. There are a bunch of sequels to Blade Runner in book form, and even a computer game that told a different story. No idea if they would actually use any of the material (and I've only read one of the books, ages ago myself) but it is there. What would people think if they got Duncan Jones to direct one? More

Posted by betamax at 15:13 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: gdykjgyjkfhjhyf
Begone foul peddlers of nonsense goods. As for the Blade Runner story ....... a thing of beauty should be left to be beautifull. In other words ........ LEAVE IT. More

Posted by Beno at 12:39 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: 'Multi platform concepts'?
L: brokenking That means I have to buy a bloody comic to get the full picture doesn't it? sp; Didn't work for the Matrix sequels, sure as hell didn't work for Southland Tales. Films should be self-contained and not require extra backstory elements in comic books, sorry 'graphic novels', or Animatrix-style spinoffs in order to make sense.   Also, Ridley Scott isn't infallible. On the assumption that he'd even be interested in returning to the Blade Runner universe, there's no More

Posted by BelfastBoy at 10:23 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: RE:
L: hatebox L: jobloffski 1) The target audience for any sequels should be people who love Blade Runner for what it IS, and that is slow, contemplative, not really meant for impressing 'the kids' and there is no real room for a kick ass hero type at the forefront of any story that would either reflect Phillip K Dick's themes/obsessions or honour the film with the rep upon which any sequel/prequel/expansion would lean upon for funding/publicity/etc . (laughs) Yeah, I'm s More

Posted by jobloffski at 10:15 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: RE:
L: jobloffski 1) The target audience for any sequels should be people who love Blade Runner for what it IS, and that is slow, contemplative, not really meant for impressing 'the kids' and there is no real room for a kick ass hero type at the forefront of any story that would either reflect Phillip K Dick's themes/obsessions or honour the film with the rep upon which any sequel/prequel/expansion would lean upon for funding/publicity/etc . (laughs) Yeah, I'm sure they'll go do More

Posted by hatebox at 09:45 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE: Franchise?
Fuck you Hollywood. Fuck you and your utter deficit of original ideas. That said, if it has to happen I beg you to leave the character of Deckard alone. Explore the rest of the film's universe and totally different characters from the first film. More

Posted by hatebox at 09:42 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

RE:
The purist in me says no. But the fanboy in me says fuck, yeah. Bring it on, suits, but listen to me (or anybody who might say similar things) when I say 1) The target audience for any sequels should be people who love Blade Runner for what it IS, and that is slow, contemplative, not really meant for impressing 'the kids' and there is no real room for a kick ass hero type at the forefront of any story that would either reflect Phillip K Dick's themes/obsessions or honour the film More

Posted by jobloffski at 08:29 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post

Alien vs Blade Runner?
Or maybe... Terminator vs Blade Runner? Arnie can do a tears in the rain speech. More

Posted by Tech_Noir at 07:14 on 03 March 2011 | Report This Post


CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
The Best Barry Norman Anecdotes From His Empire Podcast Interview
From nearly punching Robert De Niro to the real story about ‘And why not?’

Empire 300th Issue: The Directors' Cut Cover
Spielberg, Whedon, Fincher, Abrams Mann and more take over

Fired! Losing Your Job In The Movies
The lowdown on getting dismissed on film

20 Not So Super '-Men' That Won't Star In A Film Any Time Soon
Forget your Batmen, your Spider-Men and your Ant-Men… Meet 3-D Man (and his pals)

The Making Of Locke: A Filmmaker's Journey
Steven Knight takes us through six pitstops (via Heston Services)

Tom Hardy: A Viewer's Guide
The essential, the recommended, the one for the fans... and the one to avoid

Ten Things To Know About The Spooks Movie
Under the hood of The Greater Good

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Get The Empire iPad Edition Today

Subscribe and save money on annual digital subscription

Subscribe today
Buy single issues

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Get Limited Edition Collectable X-Men Art Cards

Subscribe today and get 6 issues of Empire plus a set of collectable X-Men Art Cards for only £20!

Subscribe today

Get 12 Issues Of Empire For Just £25
Receive limited edition subscribers-only covers every month Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire iPad Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  iPad  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)