Register  |   Log In  |  
Sign up to our weekly newsletter    
Empire Magazine and iPad
Follow Me on Pinterest YouTube Tumblr Viber
Trending On Empire
The Big 2015 Movie Preview
The 50 Best Films Of 2014
Review Of The Year 2014
Subscribe to Empire!
Save up to 63%
Want To Be An Empire Journalist?
We're looking for reporters for the BFI London Film Festival
Movie News

03 October 2015
Taika Waititi Directing Thor: Ragnarok
What We Do In The Shadows co-director off to Asgard
James McAvoy In Talks For M Night Shyamalan's Latest
He may replace Joaquin Phoenix
Marvel Calls Up Damage Control
New TV series in development
Brendan Gleeson And Jeremy Irons Join Assassin's Creed
They'll be part of the game adaptation
Alexander Payne's Downsizing Set Up At Paramount
Matt Damon and Reese Witherspoon still attached
Director David Leitch Enters The Coldest City
The John Wick man has a new gig
Paddy Considine Added To Peaky Blinders
He'll be a threat to Cillian Murphy's Tommy
Drew Goddard Says MGM Wants A Cabin In The Woods Sequel
But there are no ideas for more horror yet
Fox TV Plans Lethal Weapon Series
As MacGyver heads back to TV
John Ortiz Heading For Kong: Skull Island
Shea Whigham will also go ape
The Martian Rockets To The Top Of The US Box Office
The Walk strolls into a limited release
More Movie News

22 September 2015
Chris Evans In Early Talks For The Girl On The Train
Jared Leto may also join the thriller
Sicario Sequel In The Works
Lionsgate wants a follow-up to the drug war thriller
More Movie News

08 October 2015
More Future Films

Escobar: Paradise Lost (2015)
Empire Star Rating
Kidnapping Freddy Heineken (2015)
Empire Star Rating
Inherent Vice (2015)
Empire Star Rating
Into The Woods (2015)
Empire Star Rating
Edge Of Tomorrow (2014)
Empire Star Rating
More new cinemas releases
DVD & Blu-ray releases

Exclusive: Producer Talks Wolfman
No CG. Expanded Story. Character secrets

25 March 2008  |  Written by Olly Richards  

submit to reddit

It’s no secret that we consider The Wolfman one of the most exciting movies coming in 2009. The alchemy of Benicio Del Toro, Rick Baker and one of cinema’s greatest monsters has our geek-o-meter swinging to dangerous levels. So we have a lot of questions about it. We spoke to Scott Stuber, one of the producers on the Joe Johnston directed re-vamp to ask him what the movie has in store.

Empire: Everyone’s now seen the first look at Benicio Del Toro as the Wolfman (see below) Why did you decide to release the pictures so early?

Scott Stuber: Well, a big part of it is just how excited we are about the film. Also, the film had some changes in director that went down (from Mark Romanek to Joe Johnston), so we just wanted to reassure all the fans, who have been really supportive, and give something to everyone who’s been talking about Rick Baker (who did the make-up). So we thought, let’s show everyone. We have something we’re really proud of an excited about and which I think is very iconic and very indicative of the film we’re making and kind of honouring the original.

How closely are you following the original? The 1941 film has a very bare bones plot, so have you decided to expand on that?

We’ve added a lot of complexity. There are some great twists in this movie that were not in the original. But what we have done is stuck to a similar story about a guy who comes home and we’ve changed a few things. Lawrence Talbot (Benicio Del Toro) is someone who went through a family tragedy and now has come back to England to see his father, played by Tony Hopkins, and face up to some of the problems with his family. So it’s a family that’s got very dramatic issues when he returns. What we’ve tried to do is honour the original in a number of different ways, so you’ll see some fun things in the movie that hark back to the original.

In the original, the troubles in the family’s past are only really hinted at. So how are you expanding on that?

Well, I don’t want to give it all away, but there’s some pretty heavy stuff that happened during their childhood that has been a thing that fractured the family and was one of the reasons that Lawrence left. So, it’s something that hangs over father and son.

And are you keep the same period setting?

We’re set in the late 1880s to 1890, right around there.

How much do you see this as a horror movie? The George Waggner film was arguably more tragedy than horror.

Yes, it obviously has horror elements from the gothic nature of the movie and the inevitability of – the one thing the Wolfman does is he kills. So there’s got to be some scares and gore in the killings and the things he does while he’s the beast. So there’s that aspect of horror and we’re really trying to be true to that iconic horror stuff. I think the virtue of the movie and the reason we’ve got actors like Anthony Hopkins, Emily Blunt and Benicio Del Toro, is the writing. The quality of the storytelling is really interesting.

How did you entice Benicio Del Toro to this? He’s not generally a blockbuster man.

Benicio’s a huge Wolfman fan. He’s kind of the origin of this thing. The Wolfman is one of his favourite movies of all time – he’s got Wolfman memorabilia all over his house. He’s just someone who has a real passion for this. I think what’s great about the Wolfman is that he’s a complex character; he’s not just a guy who has a superpower and runs around with it. He’s a tortured soul. The ‘superpower’ of the Wolfman is damning to your soul, it’s not freeing. A superpower is usually something that sets you free, like letting you fly or giving you X-ray vision, and giving you something that people dream about. The Wolfman’s extreme power damns his soul. That’s a great complex character to play and that’s what gives Benicio a lot of opportunity to do different things as an actor.

What has he been filming so far?

We’ve seen some great stuff. We’re about three weeks into production and we’re currently doing night shoots on some of our killings. There have been some really fun sequences. It’s kind of early, but there’s some really terrific stuff with he and Emily and he and Anthony. Hugo Weaving plays a Scotland Yard detective who’s on his trail and there’s some great third act stuff with him getting ready to go find our man.

You mention Weaving as a Scotland Yard detective. Does that mean you’re widening the geography beyond the original, which was all in one village and only seemed to use about four sets?

Yes, the best thing is that telescope across the street. (laughs). There’s some great stuff in the original. But, yes, we are widening it. It still takes place in a village, called Blackmore in our film, but London gets incorporated into the film as well.

And Emily Blunt is playing Gwen Conliffe, Talbot’s love interest. Have you changed her part much from the one played by Evelyn Ankers in the original?

She’s definitely a big part of some of the problems in the family. She’s really in the midst of it. Benicio and her have a relationship that has a pretty big hurdle in the middle of it. She’s someone who’s trying to deal with all these emotional aspects as a person and at the same time having to go through this kind of unrequited love that is problematic and ultimately doomed, because he’s got this disease that’s dooming him.

Has the change in director from Mark Romanek to Joe Johnston changed the course of the film particularly?

In some ways, yes. Every director brings a different thing to the movie. The movie had a pretty solid aesthetic that we had all kind of worked towards – the writer and the producers and everyone – and we kind of knew what we were going for in terms of it’s a period movie and it’s got a gothic nature and we’re honouring the original and sticking with some of that stuff. Joe has a real love of these movies, which is great. He has a real passion for the history of the monster movie and making these kinds of films. So he’s really got an enthusiasm and love for it, which is just infectious.

Joe’s not known for this type of movie, so why did he win the job over all the directors who wanted it?

The great thing about Joe is that he’s such a diverse filmmaker. Whether you look at his family films or something like October Sky, which I thought was a great film. Then Jurassic Park III, he did a great job. That’s really hard, to come in and take a Steven Spielberg franchise and do new and different things, which I thought he did. He really brought a sense of tension and anxiety to that movie. Any good horror movie exists on how much you pull the strings before you let them go. It’s all about how far you can take the audience in tension and anxiety and I think he’d shown the ability to do that as a filmmaker, and then he really got underneath the skin of the script and understood it. His excitement about it was exciting for everyone involved.

The look of the Wolfman is vital on this film. The Lon Chaney Wolfman had a very distinctive look, which Rick Baker looks to have kept elements of, but make-up restrictions of the time meant that he was very much on the man side of wolfman. How have you found the right balance of paying homage to Chaney’s look while also making the most of everything that’s possible now?

When you make a film, casting is vital. In this, casting Rick Baker was actually one of the most important things you could do. He’s the equivalent of an A-list movie star. So, getting Rick Baker was like getting Brad Pitt, in a lot of ways. He loves The Wolfman so much and has such an affinity for it, so it was months of trials and tribulations and misses and Rick trying to figure out the hair and the snout and the teeth and the brow. It’s a constant thing that he refines and his team is amazing.

The process of transformation is almost as important as the final monster. Rick’s work on that in American Werewolf in London hasn’t been bettered, so how does he want to push that further?

We haven’t shot that yet, but we’ve done a lot of research and development on that and had a lot of discussions about it. I think the hope and opportunity is to outdo something that was so iconic. As you say, when you think of werewolf transformation you think of that moment. The hope is that we can expand on that and, for those of us who remember it, just blow our minds, and for the new generation to have their version of what American Werewolf was for us back in the day.

Does having Rick Baker mean that all Wolfman effects will be physical, rather than CG?

We really want to stick to the physical stuff. So much of what we’re trying to accomplish is that when Benicio is the wolf, you really know it’s Benicio Del Toro and you have the eyes and the emotion of what he is. That way you don’t disassociate your emotion and you realise that the person, Lawrence Talbot, who you’ve got to know in the daytime is still Lawrence Talbot at night. That way you’re empathetic towards him, you’re angry towards him, you feel for him. You wouldn’t get that with a completely CG creature who you disassociate from Benicio Del Toro. There will inevitably be some CG work to help with some of the transformation, but it’s a Rick Baker-centric film and that’s what we wanted from the get-go.

There hasn’t been a really good Werewolf movie for a couple of decades. Do you think they’re harder to get right than a Dracula or Frankenstein?

Yes and no. The interesting thing about those movies and the reason we’re all so compelled by them is that it’s the monster and trying to understand what he’s going through. That’s why we’re looking to the original. What’s great about that movie is that it’s based in character. You can’t let the idea that you have monsters mean you just go for spectacle without tying it together. The hardest thing about the Wolfman is that he’s one and the same – he’s a Wolfman. So it’s tough to bring complexity to the beast and the human.

You mention spectacle. In the original we see very little of the Wolfman, probably due to budget as much as anything. Is he more present here? Is this also, in part, an action movie?

He’s definitely more present and you’ll definitely see him have his night to roam the hillsides. It’s definitely something that’s out there more than the original because we do have the opportunity and the tools at hand to recreate it in a way that feels more real than you could do back in those days.

If this proves a success, are there plans to resurrect other Universal monsters?

Yeah, I think so. We’ve talked to the studio a bit about it. I know [Universal President of Production] Donna Langley and [Co-Chairmen] Marc Schmuger and David Linde have talked a lot about that. One of the great pedigrees of Universal is its monsters. You go on the tour and Frankenstein and the Wolfman are still hanging around. To recreate those with different visions and different cast is something that everybody’s excited about doing.

Have Your Say
To comment on this, and all articles, register for free or login now.

Gandolfini In Taking Of Pelham 1, 2, 3
Joining Travolta and Washington
New Indiana Jones Featurette Online
Shia LaBeouf gets knife happy

Your Comments

Guillermo Del Torro on Branagh's Frankenstein- "Yeah, I promise one thing. If I do Frankenstein ever, I will not star in it or appear shirtless. I can promise you that! People are at least not going to puke." I love this guy, ha ha ha. More

Posted by jimoakley666 at 15:00 on 27 March 2008 | Report This Post

Thanks for that - i suppose it answers my Lovecraft query. What a disappointment, i was looking forward to that. Oh well.. More

Posted by Hands Randall at 18:20 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

There's some more #660000]here if you want a few more details More

Posted by Olly Richards at 15:13 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

It's all good! I must have missed that. Looking forward to his At the Mountains of Madness - obviously on his 'to do' list too. More

Posted by Hands Randall at 14:39 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

L: Hands Randall L: britesparc Bring on either Tim Burton (see Sleepy Hollow windmill) or Guillermo DelTorro for Frankenstein, I say. Del Toro for Frankenstein. Now you're talking. el Toro's actually planning a version of Frankenstein, among a million other projects. But it's probably a TV mini-series rather than a movie. More

Posted by Olly Richards at 14:00 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

L: britesparc Bring on either Tim Burton (see Sleepy Hollow windmill) or Guillermo DelTorro for Frankenstein, I say. sp; Del Toro for Frankenstein. Now you're talking. More

Posted by Hands Randall at 13:34 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

No CG.
I can't believe it! I can't think of a half decent werewolf movie which features CG. Hooray. Shame it's a balls sucking remake though. More

Posted by Lupin 3 at 13:07 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

I can't wait. I'm particularly glad to read that it's not going to rely too heavily on CG. This can only be good as the CG thing is now starting to look a bit samey. Bring back some craft!! More

Posted by Hands Randall at 13:03 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

L: britesparc There hasn't been a good Dracula or Frankenstein movie for a couple of decades, either. oo right! Branagh's Frankenstein was shite and Coppola's Dracula was very... camp. Hmm. Hopkins was the best thing in that and lets not even mention the, ahem, Harkers. Good god. "Dude! Its, like, Dracula, maaan." "Yuh!, I know, dude! It, like, so frickin' is!" Bring on either Tim Burton (see Sleepy Hollow windmill) or Guillermo DelTorro for Frankenstein, I say. More

Posted by jimoakley666 at 09:59 on 25 March 2008 | Report This Post

RE: Has Scott played fetch wit Del Toro yet?
Rick Baker's got it on the money to be able to capture that Chaney-furry look and still make it scary as hell. I'm sure Chaney Snr, the father of horrorific make up artistry would've been proud.   A little disconcerted that a script by Walker has to be rewritten. His inclusion in the crew was what gave me hope this would be a standout, afterall Del Toro and Hopkins are human enough to be hobbled by their material.   I just hope Johnston's love of monster movies lead More

Posted by spodo komodo at 22:20 on 23 March 2008 | Report This Post

Has Scott played fetch wit Del Toro yet?
You know coz Benecio is a method actor and likes to live his part (he even insisted to be called Jackie on set on Sin City) Oh and to those who says there hasn't been a good werewolf movie in decades - I'm with many other people here - Dog Soldiers. The werewolves were fantastic and so was the rest of the movie. More

Posted by Taz69 at 09:22 on 22 March 2008 | Report This Post

RE: There hasn’t been a really good Werewolf movie for a couple of decades.
L: jezburg Ginger Snaps was pretty good. sp; Only if you're 14.   There are only three dern werewolf movies - ling, An American Werewolf in London]Dog Soldiersthing else ranges from "alright" ( Silver Bullet, A Company Of Wolves, Wolfful (lings, ican Werewolf In Parisul-destroyingly pathetic (/i]).   I'm not really sure about this . I'd like to see another good movie in the werewolf canon but my gut feeling is this'll be closer to singnything else. More

Posted by A.M.M.O at 05:29 on 22 March 2008 | Report This Post

looks nasty More

Posted by DeadCell79 at 04:39 on 22 March 2008 | Report This Post

RE: I agree
I bet Hopkins is another werewolf. More

Posted by Clarence_Worley at 01:20 on 22 March 2008 | Report This Post

RE: I agree
L: dave_0989 I hope it's like the Francis ford coppola Dracula and the Kenneth Branagh Frankenstein in the 90's and if this works i can see more werewolf movies jus like when Gladiator was a success and we got crap like troy and alexander. sp; But Dracula and Frankenstein (particularly) bombed!   Ginger Snaps was one of the most interesting takes on the werewolf story and, IMO, a really good movie. I'd disagree on Dog Soldiers as well - but that was more an action film. More

Posted by elab49 at 20:57 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

I agree
There hasn't been a good werewolf movie for a while so this movie has alot to live up to and that was a lot of hypefor the transformation in my opinion American werewolf in london is still the best werewolf trnasformation ever !!!! but his film has a lot of potential I hope it's like the Francis ford coppola Dracula and the Kenneth Branagh Frankenstein in the 90's and if this works i can see more werewolf movies jus like when Gladiator was a success and we got crap like troy and alexander. More

Posted by dave_0989 at 20:36 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

Beware the Moon
In /b]'s defence they did say a good werewolf movie' og Soldiers]Ginger Snapsve pretty good but they weren't /i] good. I just really really hope the physical stuff really does win out over CG. JEDI BOBSTER More

Posted by JediBobster at 18:52 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

There hasn't been a good Dracula or Frankenstein movie for a couple of decades, either. More

Posted by britesparc at 17:44 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

There have been several good werewolf movies
Ginger Snaps is awesome - one of the best werewolf movies ever!, dog Soldiers was good too , the 80's had the best ones though. More

Posted by princemadonna at 17:20 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

I'm really happy with the way this is going, as the original is favourite of mine. I like the focus on the old make-up design, and the broadening of the original's scope. I'm confident in Del Toro, and I'm confident in Johnston, who hired David Self to polish the script. More

Posted by doctorolorinbats1975 at 13:58 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

There hasn’t been a really good Werewolf movie for a couple of decades.
Dog Soldiers anyone? More

Posted by Amity75 at 12:33 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

Benicio , Kevin Walker yes Johnson not sure
I have to say I'm excited at the prospect of this although it's Del Toro and Andrew Kevin Walkers participation more than Johnson. Many people knocked Lost World but it was darn site better than Johnsons awful JP3. I am optimistic will pull off a Curtis Hanson style reinvention of his career with this as the material is too good to waste, it's just if does a lacklustre job like Ratner on Red Dragon when a more talented auteur like Romanek would have done it justice it's gonna be one hell o More

Posted by agent cooper at 11:59 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

There hasn’t been a really good Werewolf movie for a couple of decades.
Ginger Snaps was pretty good. More

Posted by jezburg at 11:48 on 21 March 2008 | Report This Post

Jessica Chastain On The Martian
On becoming an astronaut and rescuing Matt Damon AGAIN

My Movie Life: Justin Kurzel
The Macbeth director on how Rocky changed his life and the worst ever date movie

Life On Mars: Trips To The Red Planet
A dozen of cinema's Martian misadventures

Hallowed Ground: Folk Horror In British Film
Ten tales from our island's dark past

All Hail Macbeth! The Scottish Play On Film
By the pricking of our thumbs, ten adaptations this way come(s)

Licence Denied: The Bond Themes You Didn't Get To Hear
A dozen of 007's greatest misses

10 Star Wars: The Force Awakens Toys You’ll Want To Own
Falcon quad copter? BB-8 Sphero? We’re already asking for pay raises…

Subscribe to Empire magazine
Empire print magazine

Delivered to your door – with exclusive subscriber only covers each month! Save money today and

Subscribe now!

Subscribe to Empire iPad edition
Empire digital magazine

Exclusive and enhanced content – get instant access via your iPad or Android device! Save money today and

Subscribe now!

Subscribe now and save up to 63%
Print, Digital & Package options available Subscribe today!
Empire's Film Studies 101 Series
Everything you ever wanted to know about filmmaking but were afraid to ask...
The Empire Digital Edition
With exclusive extras, interactive features, trailers and much more! Download now
Home  |  News  |  Blogs  |  Reviews  |  Future Films  |  Features  |  Interviews  |  Images  |  Competitions  |  Forum  |  Digital Edition  |  Podcast  |  Magazine Contact Us  |  Empire FAQ  |  Subscribe To Empire  |  Register
© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd  |  Legal Info  |  Editorial Complaints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Bauer Entertainment Network
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085 and registered address 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)